Searched hist:"71 b0576b" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/reiserfs/ |
| H A D | reiserfs.h | 71b0576b Wed Apr 05 07:09:48 CDT 2017 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> reiserfs: Make cancel_old_flush() reliable
Currently canceling of delayed work that flushes old data using
cancel_old_flush() does not prevent work from being requeued. Thus
in theory new work can be queued after cancel_old_flush() from
reiserfs_freeze() has run. This will become larger problem once
flush_old_commits() can requeue the work itself.
Fix the problem by recording in sbi->work_queue that flushing work is
canceled and should not be requeued.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
71b0576b Wed Apr 05 07:09:48 CDT 2017 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> reiserfs: Make cancel_old_flush() reliable
Currently canceling of delayed work that flushes old data using
cancel_old_flush() does not prevent work from being requeued. Thus
in theory new work can be queued after cancel_old_flush() from
reiserfs_freeze() has run. This will become larger problem once
flush_old_commits() can requeue the work itself.
Fix the problem by recording in sbi->work_queue that flushing work is
canceled and should not be requeued.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| H A D | journal.c | 71b0576b Wed Apr 05 07:09:48 CDT 2017 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> reiserfs: Make cancel_old_flush() reliable
Currently canceling of delayed work that flushes old data using
cancel_old_flush() does not prevent work from being requeued. Thus
in theory new work can be queued after cancel_old_flush() from
reiserfs_freeze() has run. This will become larger problem once
flush_old_commits() can requeue the work itself.
Fix the problem by recording in sbi->work_queue that flushing work is
canceled and should not be requeued.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
71b0576b Wed Apr 05 07:09:48 CDT 2017 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> reiserfs: Make cancel_old_flush() reliable
Currently canceling of delayed work that flushes old data using
cancel_old_flush() does not prevent work from being requeued. Thus
in theory new work can be queued after cancel_old_flush() from
reiserfs_freeze() has run. This will become larger problem once
flush_old_commits() can requeue the work itself.
Fix the problem by recording in sbi->work_queue that flushing work is
canceled and should not be requeued.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| H A D | super.c | 71b0576b Wed Apr 05 07:09:48 CDT 2017 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> reiserfs: Make cancel_old_flush() reliable
Currently canceling of delayed work that flushes old data using
cancel_old_flush() does not prevent work from being requeued. Thus
in theory new work can be queued after cancel_old_flush() from
reiserfs_freeze() has run. This will become larger problem once
flush_old_commits() can requeue the work itself.
Fix the problem by recording in sbi->work_queue that flushing work is
canceled and should not be requeued.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
71b0576b Wed Apr 05 07:09:48 CDT 2017 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> reiserfs: Make cancel_old_flush() reliable
Currently canceling of delayed work that flushes old data using
cancel_old_flush() does not prevent work from being requeued. Thus
in theory new work can be queued after cancel_old_flush() from
reiserfs_freeze() has run. This will become larger problem once
flush_old_commits() can requeue the work itself.
Fix the problem by recording in sbi->work_queue that flushing work is
canceled and should not be requeued.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|