Searched hist:"6 b6aa828" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/qemu/hw/9pfs/ |
| H A D | 9p.h | 6b6aa828 Mon Oct 07 10:02:45 CDT 2019 Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> 9p: Use variable length suffixes for inode remapping
Use variable length suffixes for inode remapping instead of the fixed
16 bit size prefixes before. With this change the inode numbers on guest
will typically be much smaller (e.g. around >2^1 .. >2^7 instead of >2^48
with the previous fixed size inode remapping.
Additionally this solution is more efficient, since inode numbers in
practice can take almost their entire 64 bit range on guest as well, so
there is less likely a need for generating and tracking additional suffixes,
which might also be beneficial for nested virtualization where each level of
virtualization would shift up the inode bits and increase the chance of
expensive remapping actions.
The "Exponential Golomb" algorithm is used as basis for generating the
variable length suffixes. The algorithm has a parameter k which controls the
distribution of bits on increasing indeces (minimum bits at low index vs.
maximum bits at high index). With k=0 the generated suffixes look like:
Index Dec/Bin -> Generated Suffix Bin
1 [1] -> [1] (1 bits)
2 [10] -> [010] (3 bits)
3 [11] -> [110] (3 bits)
4 [100] -> [00100] (5 bits)
5 [101] -> [10100] (5 bits)
6 [110] -> [01100] (5 bits)
7 [111] -> [11100] (5 bits)
8 [1000] -> [0001000] (7 bits)
9 [1001] -> [1001000] (7 bits)
10 [1010] -> [0101000] (7 bits)
11 [1011] -> [1101000] (7 bits)
12 [1100] -> [0011000] (7 bits)
...
65533 [1111111111111101] -> [1011111111111111000000000000000] (31 bits)
65534 [1111111111111110] -> [0111111111111111000000000000000] (31 bits)
65535 [1111111111111111] -> [1111111111111111000000000000000] (31 bits)
Hence minBits=1 maxBits=31
And with k=5 they would look like:
Index Dec/Bin -> Generated Suffix Bin
1 [1] -> [000001] (6 bits)
2 [10] -> [100001] (6 bits)
3 [11] -> [010001] (6 bits)
4 [100] -> [110001] (6 bits)
5 [101] -> [001001] (6 bits)
6 [110] -> [101001] (6 bits)
7 [111] -> [011001] (6 bits)
8 [1000] -> [111001] (6 bits)
9 [1001] -> [000101] (6 bits)
10 [1010] -> [100101] (6 bits)
11 [1011] -> [010101] (6 bits)
12 [1100] -> [110101] (6 bits)
...
65533 [1111111111111101] -> [0011100000000000100000000000] (28 bits)
65534 [1111111111111110] -> [1011100000000000100000000000] (28 bits)
65535 [1111111111111111] -> [0111100000000000100000000000] (28 bits)
Hence minBits=6 maxBits=28
Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
|
| H A D | 9p.c | 6b6aa828 Mon Oct 07 10:02:45 CDT 2019 Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> 9p: Use variable length suffixes for inode remapping
Use variable length suffixes for inode remapping instead of the fixed
16 bit size prefixes before. With this change the inode numbers on guest
will typically be much smaller (e.g. around >2^1 .. >2^7 instead of >2^48
with the previous fixed size inode remapping.
Additionally this solution is more efficient, since inode numbers in
practice can take almost their entire 64 bit range on guest as well, so
there is less likely a need for generating and tracking additional suffixes,
which might also be beneficial for nested virtualization where each level of
virtualization would shift up the inode bits and increase the chance of
expensive remapping actions.
The "Exponential Golomb" algorithm is used as basis for generating the
variable length suffixes. The algorithm has a parameter k which controls the
distribution of bits on increasing indeces (minimum bits at low index vs.
maximum bits at high index). With k=0 the generated suffixes look like:
Index Dec/Bin -> Generated Suffix Bin
1 [1] -> [1] (1 bits)
2 [10] -> [010] (3 bits)
3 [11] -> [110] (3 bits)
4 [100] -> [00100] (5 bits)
5 [101] -> [10100] (5 bits)
6 [110] -> [01100] (5 bits)
7 [111] -> [11100] (5 bits)
8 [1000] -> [0001000] (7 bits)
9 [1001] -> [1001000] (7 bits)
10 [1010] -> [0101000] (7 bits)
11 [1011] -> [1101000] (7 bits)
12 [1100] -> [0011000] (7 bits)
...
65533 [1111111111111101] -> [1011111111111111000000000000000] (31 bits)
65534 [1111111111111110] -> [0111111111111111000000000000000] (31 bits)
65535 [1111111111111111] -> [1111111111111111000000000000000] (31 bits)
Hence minBits=1 maxBits=31
And with k=5 they would look like:
Index Dec/Bin -> Generated Suffix Bin
1 [1] -> [000001] (6 bits)
2 [10] -> [100001] (6 bits)
3 [11] -> [010001] (6 bits)
4 [100] -> [110001] (6 bits)
5 [101] -> [001001] (6 bits)
6 [110] -> [101001] (6 bits)
7 [111] -> [011001] (6 bits)
8 [1000] -> [111001] (6 bits)
9 [1001] -> [000101] (6 bits)
10 [1010] -> [100101] (6 bits)
11 [1011] -> [010101] (6 bits)
12 [1100] -> [110101] (6 bits)
...
65533 [1111111111111101] -> [0011100000000000100000000000] (28 bits)
65534 [1111111111111110] -> [1011100000000000100000000000] (28 bits)
65535 [1111111111111111] -> [0111100000000000100000000000] (28 bits)
Hence minBits=6 maxBits=28
Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
|