Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:"67 d25186" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/fs/ext4/
H A Dmballoc.c67d25186 Thu Apr 01 12:21:23 CDT 2021 Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com> ext4: drop s_mb_bal_lock and convert protected fields to atomic

s_mb_buddies_generated gets used later in this patch series to
determine if the cr 0 and cr 1 optimziations should be performed or
not. Currently, s_mb_buddies_generated is protected under a
spin_lock. In the allocation path, it is better if we don't depend on
the lock and instead read the value atomically. In order to do that,
we drop s_bal_lock altogether and we convert the only two protected
fields by it s_mb_buddies_generated and s_mb_generation_time to atomic
type.

Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401172129.189766-2-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
H A Dext4.h67d25186 Thu Apr 01 12:21:23 CDT 2021 Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com> ext4: drop s_mb_bal_lock and convert protected fields to atomic

s_mb_buddies_generated gets used later in this patch series to
determine if the cr 0 and cr 1 optimziations should be performed or
not. Currently, s_mb_buddies_generated is protected under a
spin_lock. In the allocation path, it is better if we don't depend on
the lock and instead read the value atomically. In order to do that,
we drop s_bal_lock altogether and we convert the only two protected
fields by it s_mb_buddies_generated and s_mb_generation_time to atomic
type.

Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401172129.189766-2-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>