Searched hist:"5 fdca653" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/sunrpc/ |
| H A D | svc_rdma.h | 5fdca653 Tue Nov 29 10:04:42 CST 2016 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> svcrdma: Renovate sendto chunk list parsing
The current sendto code appears to support clients that provide only
one of a Read list, a Write list, or a Reply chunk. My reading of
that code is that it doesn't support the following cases:
- Read list + Write list
- Read list + Reply chunk
- Write list + Reply chunk
- Read list + Write list + Reply chunk
The protocol allows more than one Read or Write chunk in those
lists. Some clients do send a Read list and Reply chunk
simultaneously. NFSv4 WRITE uses a Read list for the data payload,
and a Reply chunk because the GETATTR result in the reply can
contain a large object like an ACL.
Generalize one of the sendto code paths needed to support all of
the above cases, and attempt to ensure that only one pass is done
through the RPC Call's transport header to gather chunk list
information for building the reply.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
5fdca653 Tue Nov 29 10:04:42 CST 2016 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> svcrdma: Renovate sendto chunk list parsing
The current sendto code appears to support clients that provide only
one of a Read list, a Write list, or a Reply chunk. My reading of
that code is that it doesn't support the following cases:
- Read list + Write list
- Read list + Reply chunk
- Write list + Reply chunk
- Read list + Write list + Reply chunk
The protocol allows more than one Read or Write chunk in those
lists. Some clients do send a Read list and Reply chunk
simultaneously. NFSv4 WRITE uses a Read list for the data payload,
and a Reply chunk because the GETATTR result in the reply can
contain a large object like an ACL.
Generalize one of the sendto code paths needed to support all of
the above cases, and attempt to ensure that only one pass is done
through the RPC Call's transport header to gather chunk list
information for building the reply.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/ |
| H A D | svc_rdma_sendto.c | 5fdca653 Tue Nov 29 10:04:42 CST 2016 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> svcrdma: Renovate sendto chunk list parsing
The current sendto code appears to support clients that provide only
one of a Read list, a Write list, or a Reply chunk. My reading of
that code is that it doesn't support the following cases:
- Read list + Write list
- Read list + Reply chunk
- Write list + Reply chunk
- Read list + Write list + Reply chunk
The protocol allows more than one Read or Write chunk in those
lists. Some clients do send a Read list and Reply chunk
simultaneously. NFSv4 WRITE uses a Read list for the data payload,
and a Reply chunk because the GETATTR result in the reply can
contain a large object like an ACL.
Generalize one of the sendto code paths needed to support all of
the above cases, and attempt to ensure that only one pass is done
through the RPC Call's transport header to gather chunk list
information for building the reply.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
5fdca653 Tue Nov 29 10:04:42 CST 2016 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> svcrdma: Renovate sendto chunk list parsing
The current sendto code appears to support clients that provide only
one of a Read list, a Write list, or a Reply chunk. My reading of
that code is that it doesn't support the following cases:
- Read list + Write list
- Read list + Reply chunk
- Write list + Reply chunk
- Read list + Write list + Reply chunk
The protocol allows more than one Read or Write chunk in those
lists. Some clients do send a Read list and Reply chunk
simultaneously. NFSv4 WRITE uses a Read list for the data payload,
and a Reply chunk because the GETATTR result in the reply can
contain a large object like an ACL.
Generalize one of the sendto code paths needed to support all of
the above cases, and attempt to ensure that only one pass is done
through the RPC Call's transport header to gather chunk list
information for building the reply.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | svc_rdma_recvfrom.c | 5fdca653 Tue Nov 29 10:04:42 CST 2016 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> svcrdma: Renovate sendto chunk list parsing
The current sendto code appears to support clients that provide only
one of a Read list, a Write list, or a Reply chunk. My reading of
that code is that it doesn't support the following cases:
- Read list + Write list
- Read list + Reply chunk
- Write list + Reply chunk
- Read list + Write list + Reply chunk
The protocol allows more than one Read or Write chunk in those
lists. Some clients do send a Read list and Reply chunk
simultaneously. NFSv4 WRITE uses a Read list for the data payload,
and a Reply chunk because the GETATTR result in the reply can
contain a large object like an ACL.
Generalize one of the sendto code paths needed to support all of
the above cases, and attempt to ensure that only one pass is done
through the RPC Call's transport header to gather chunk list
information for building the reply.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
5fdca653 Tue Nov 29 10:04:42 CST 2016 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> svcrdma: Renovate sendto chunk list parsing
The current sendto code appears to support clients that provide only
one of a Read list, a Write list, or a Reply chunk. My reading of
that code is that it doesn't support the following cases:
- Read list + Write list
- Read list + Reply chunk
- Write list + Reply chunk
- Read list + Write list + Reply chunk
The protocol allows more than one Read or Write chunk in those
lists. Some clients do send a Read list and Reply chunk
simultaneously. NFSv4 WRITE uses a Read list for the data payload,
and a Reply chunk because the GETATTR result in the reply can
contain a large object like an ACL.
Generalize one of the sendto code paths needed to support all of
the above cases, and attempt to ensure that only one pass is done
through the RPC Call's transport header to gather chunk list
information for building the reply.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|