/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/loongson64/ |
H A D | dma.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/loongson2ef/fuloong-2e/ |
H A D | dma.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/loongson2ef/lemote-2f/ |
H A D | dma.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/sgi-ip32/ |
H A D | ip32-dma.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/include/asm/ |
H A D | dma-direct.h | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ |
H A D | dma-direct.h | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/pci/ |
H A D | pci-ar2315.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
H A D | pci-xtalk-bridge.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/bmips/ |
H A D | dma.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
H A D | dma-direct.h | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/ |
H A D | dma-octeon.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/kernel/dma/ |
H A D | direct.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
H A D | swiotlb.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/iommu/intel/ |
H A D | iommu.c | 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> 5ceda740 Mon Aug 17 10:34:03 CDT 2020 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> dma-direct: rename and cleanup __phys_to_dma The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|