| /openbmc/linux/arch/mips/kvm/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | mips.c | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/virt/kvm/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | kvm_main.c | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/s390/kvm/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | kvm-s390.c | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/powerpc/kvm/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | powerpc.c | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | kvm_host.h | 5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
5cb0944c Tue Dec 12 10:41:34 CST 2017 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
"traditional" synchronous ioctls.
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|