Searched hist:"5 b00f14f" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/xfs/ |
| H A D | xfs_trans_priv.h | 5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
|
| H A D | xfs_trans_ail.c | 5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
|
| H A D | xfs_trans.h | 5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
|
| H A D | xfs_log.c | 5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
|
| H A D | xfs_log_recover.c | 5b00f14f Thu Oct 30 01:39:00 CDT 2008 David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> [XFS] move the AIl traversal over to a consistent interface
With the new cursor interface, it makes sense to make all the traversing
code use the cursor interface and make the old one go away. This means
more of the AIL interfacing is done by passing struct xfs_ail pointers
around the place instead of struct xfs_mount pointers.
We can replace the use of xfs_trans_first_ail() in xfs_log_need_covered()
as it is only checking if the AIL is empty. We can do that with a call to
xfs_trans_ail_tail() instead, where a zero LSN returned indicates and
empty AIL...
SGI-PV: 988143
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32348a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
|