Searched hist:"5579 a966" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/sound/soc/amd/ps/ |
| H A D | ps-pdm-dma.c | 5579a966 Tue Jan 31 12:46:52 CST 2023 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> ASoC: amd: ps: Add a module parameter to influence pdm_gain
In case of regressions for any users that the new pdm_gain value is
too high and for additional debugging, introduce a module parameter
that would let them configure it.
This parameter should be removed in the future:
* If it's determined that the parameter is not needed, just hardcode
the correct value as before
* If users do end up using it to debug and report different values
we should introduce a config knob that can have policy set by ucm.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230131184653.10216-7-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | acp63.h | 5579a966 Tue Jan 31 12:46:52 CST 2023 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> ASoC: amd: ps: Add a module parameter to influence pdm_gain
In case of regressions for any users that the new pdm_gain value is
too high and for additional debugging, introduce a module parameter
that would let them configure it.
This parameter should be removed in the future:
* If it's determined that the parameter is not needed, just hardcode
the correct value as before
* If users do end up using it to debug and report different values
we should introduce a config knob that can have policy set by ucm.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230131184653.10216-7-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|