Searched hist:"4 b936885" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
/openbmc/linux/fs/ |
H A D | anon_inodes.c | 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems
Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
|
H A D | pipe.c | 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems
Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
|
H A D | dcache.c | 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems
Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
|
/openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
H A D | dcache.h | 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems
Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
|
/openbmc/linux/net/ |
H A D | socket.c | 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems
Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> 4b936885 Fri Jan 07 00:50:07 CST 2011 Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems Regardless of how much we possibly try to scale dcache, there is likely always going to be some fundamental contention when adding or removing children under the same parent. Pseudo filesystems do not seem need to have connected dentries because by definition they are disconnected. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
|