Searched hist:"4 b6cb5d8" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/net/ipv6/ |
| H A D | reassembly.c | 4b6cb5d8 Mon Oct 15 04:41:09 CDT 2007 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> [INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
4b6cb5d8 Mon Oct 15 04:41:09 CDT 2007 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> [INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/ipv6/netfilter/ |
| H A D | nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 4b6cb5d8 Mon Oct 15 04:41:09 CDT 2007 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> [INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
4b6cb5d8 Mon Oct 15 04:41:09 CDT 2007 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> [INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/ipv4/ |
| H A D | ip_fragment.c | 4b6cb5d8 Mon Oct 15 04:41:09 CDT 2007 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> [INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
4b6cb5d8 Mon Oct 15 04:41:09 CDT 2007 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> [INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|