Searched hist:"42 df744c" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
/openbmc/linux/security/selinux/ |
H A D | selinuxfs.c | 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers
Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
|
H A D | hooks.c | 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers
Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/security/ |
H A D | security.c | 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers
Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
H A D | security.h | 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers
Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/infiniband/core/ |
H A D | device.c | 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers
Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> 42df744c Fri Jun 14 07:20:14 CDT 2019 Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> LSM: switch to blocking policy update notifiers Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
|