| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm/mach-exynos/ |
| H A D | exynos-smc.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | sleep.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | Makefile | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm/mach-omap2/ |
| H A D | sleep43xx.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | sleep33xx.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | omap-smc.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | sleep44xx.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | omap-headsmp.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | sleep34xx.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | Makefile | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm/mach-highbank/ |
| H A D | smc.S | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | Makefile | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm/mach-keystone/ |
| H A D | Makefile | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm/mach-bcm/ |
| H A D | bcm_kona_smc.c | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
| H A D | Makefile | 3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
3fe1ee40 Mon May 27 17:40:50 CDT 2019 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument
The LLVM Target parser currently does not allow to specify the security
extension as part of -march (see also LLVM Bug 40186 [0]). When trying
to use Clang with LLVM's integrated assembler, this leads to build
errors such as this:
clang-8: error: the clang compiler does not support '-Wa,-march=armv7-a+sec'
Use ".arch_extension sec" to enable the security extension in a more
portable fasion. Also make sure to use ".arch armv7-a" in case a v6/v7
multi-platform kernel is being built.
Note that this is technically not exactly the same as the old code
checked for availabilty of the security extension by calling as-instr.
However, there are already other sites which use ".arch_extension sec"
unconditionally, hence de-facto we need an assembler capable of
".arch_extension sec" already today (arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S). The
arch extension "sec" is available since binutils 2.21 according to
its documentation [1].
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/ARM-Options.html
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|