Searched hist:"3 e01cee3" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/overlayfs/ |
| H A D | readdir.c | 3e01cee3 Fri Dec 12 17:59:45 CST 2014 Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> ovl: check whiteout on lowest layer as well
Not checking whiteouts on lowest layer was an optimization (there's nothing
to white out there), but it could result in inconsitent behavior when a
layer previously used as upper/middle is later used as lowest.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
3e01cee3 Fri Dec 12 17:59:45 CST 2014 Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> ovl: check whiteout on lowest layer as well
Not checking whiteouts on lowest layer was an optimization (there's nothing
to white out there), but it could result in inconsitent behavior when a
layer previously used as upper/middle is later used as lowest.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
|
| H A D | super.c | 3e01cee3 Fri Dec 12 17:59:45 CST 2014 Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> ovl: check whiteout on lowest layer as well
Not checking whiteouts on lowest layer was an optimization (there's nothing
to white out there), but it could result in inconsitent behavior when a
layer previously used as upper/middle is later used as lowest.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
3e01cee3 Fri Dec 12 17:59:45 CST 2014 Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> ovl: check whiteout on lowest layer as well
Not checking whiteouts on lowest layer was an optimization (there's nothing
to white out there), but it could result in inconsitent behavior when a
layer previously used as upper/middle is later used as lowest.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
|