Searched hist:"34 f42a07" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/scsi/libfc/ |
| H A D | fc_disc.c | 34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| H A D | fc_rport.c | 34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| H A D | fc_lport.c | 34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| H A D | fc_fcp.c | 34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/scsi/ |
| H A D | libfc.h | 34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
34f42a07 Fri Feb 27 12:55:45 CST 2009 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> [SCSI] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|