Searched hist:"1 c0f4872" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/gfs2/ |
| H A D | glock.h | 1c0f4872 Mon Jan 22 11:10:39 CST 2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> [GFS2] Remove local exclusive glock mode
Here is a patch for GFS2 to remove the local exclusive flag. In
the places it was used, mutex's are always held earlier in the
call path, so it appears redundant in the LM_ST_SHARED case.
Also, the GFS2 holders were setting local exclusive in any case where
the requested lock was LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE. So the other places in the glock
code where the flag was tested have been replaced with tests for the
lock state being LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE in order to ensure the logic is the
same as before (i.e. LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE is always locally exclusive as well
as globally exclusive).
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
1c0f4872 Mon Jan 22 11:10:39 CST 2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> [GFS2] Remove local exclusive glock mode
Here is a patch for GFS2 to remove the local exclusive flag. In
the places it was used, mutex's are always held earlier in the
call path, so it appears redundant in the LM_ST_SHARED case.
Also, the GFS2 holders were setting local exclusive in any case where
the requested lock was LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE. So the other places in the glock
code where the flag was tested have been replaced with tests for the
lock state being LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE in order to ensure the logic is the
same as before (i.e. LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE is always locally exclusive as well
as globally exclusive).
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | glops.c | 1c0f4872 Mon Jan 22 11:10:39 CST 2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> [GFS2] Remove local exclusive glock mode
Here is a patch for GFS2 to remove the local exclusive flag. In
the places it was used, mutex's are always held earlier in the
call path, so it appears redundant in the LM_ST_SHARED case.
Also, the GFS2 holders were setting local exclusive in any case where
the requested lock was LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE. So the other places in the glock
code where the flag was tested have been replaced with tests for the
lock state being LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE in order to ensure the logic is the
same as before (i.e. LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE is always locally exclusive as well
as globally exclusive).
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
1c0f4872 Mon Jan 22 11:10:39 CST 2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> [GFS2] Remove local exclusive glock mode
Here is a patch for GFS2 to remove the local exclusive flag. In
the places it was used, mutex's are always held earlier in the
call path, so it appears redundant in the LM_ST_SHARED case.
Also, the GFS2 holders were setting local exclusive in any case where
the requested lock was LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE. So the other places in the glock
code where the flag was tested have been replaced with tests for the
lock state being LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE in order to ensure the logic is the
same as before (i.e. LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE is always locally exclusive as well
as globally exclusive).
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | super.c | 1c0f4872 Mon Jan 22 11:10:39 CST 2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> [GFS2] Remove local exclusive glock mode
Here is a patch for GFS2 to remove the local exclusive flag. In
the places it was used, mutex's are always held earlier in the
call path, so it appears redundant in the LM_ST_SHARED case.
Also, the GFS2 holders were setting local exclusive in any case where
the requested lock was LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE. So the other places in the glock
code where the flag was tested have been replaced with tests for the
lock state being LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE in order to ensure the logic is the
same as before (i.e. LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE is always locally exclusive as well
as globally exclusive).
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
1c0f4872 Mon Jan 22 11:10:39 CST 2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> [GFS2] Remove local exclusive glock mode
Here is a patch for GFS2 to remove the local exclusive flag. In
the places it was used, mutex's are always held earlier in the
call path, so it appears redundant in the LM_ST_SHARED case.
Also, the GFS2 holders were setting local exclusive in any case where
the requested lock was LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE. So the other places in the glock
code where the flag was tested have been replaced with tests for the
lock state being LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE in order to ensure the logic is the
same as before (i.e. LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE is always locally exclusive as well
as globally exclusive).
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | glock.c | 1c0f4872 Mon Jan 22 11:10:39 CST 2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> [GFS2] Remove local exclusive glock mode
Here is a patch for GFS2 to remove the local exclusive flag. In
the places it was used, mutex's are always held earlier in the
call path, so it appears redundant in the LM_ST_SHARED case.
Also, the GFS2 holders were setting local exclusive in any case where
the requested lock was LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE. So the other places in the glock
code where the flag was tested have been replaced with tests for the
lock state being LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE in order to ensure the logic is the
same as before (i.e. LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE is always locally exclusive as well
as globally exclusive).
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
1c0f4872 Mon Jan 22 11:10:39 CST 2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> [GFS2] Remove local exclusive glock mode
Here is a patch for GFS2 to remove the local exclusive flag. In
the places it was used, mutex's are always held earlier in the
call path, so it appears redundant in the LM_ST_SHARED case.
Also, the GFS2 holders were setting local exclusive in any case where
the requested lock was LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE. So the other places in the glock
code where the flag was tested have been replaced with tests for the
lock state being LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE in order to ensure the logic is the
same as before (i.e. LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE is always locally exclusive as well
as globally exclusive).
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
|