Searched hist:"1 b6ff1cb" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/ |
| H A D | sun50i-a64-pinebook.dts | 1b6ff1cb Tue Aug 28 05:01:32 CDT 2018 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Rename r_i2c_pins_a label to r_i2c_pl89_pins
The pinmux name and label for a specific function should denote which
pingroup it is on, or if there is only one option for the function, have
not enumerating prefix/suffix at all.
The "r_i2c_pins_a" label is renamed to "r_i2c_pl89_pins" to fit our
current style. The node name "i2c" is also changed to "r-i2c-pl89-pins"
to match. The reason for the peculiar name is that the other option for
muxing R_I2C is on the PL0/PL1 pins, so the name has to mention the pin
numbers in addition to the pingroup.
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
1b6ff1cb Tue Aug 28 05:01:32 CDT 2018 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Rename r_i2c_pins_a label to r_i2c_pl89_pins
The pinmux name and label for a specific function should denote which
pingroup it is on, or if there is only one option for the function, have
not enumerating prefix/suffix at all.
The "r_i2c_pins_a" label is renamed to "r_i2c_pl89_pins" to fit our
current style. The node name "i2c" is also changed to "r-i2c-pl89-pins"
to match. The reason for the peculiar name is that the other option for
muxing R_I2C is on the PL0/PL1 pins, so the name has to mention the pin
numbers in addition to the pingroup.
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
| H A D | sun50i-a64.dtsi | 1b6ff1cb Tue Aug 28 05:01:32 CDT 2018 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Rename r_i2c_pins_a label to r_i2c_pl89_pins
The pinmux name and label for a specific function should denote which
pingroup it is on, or if there is only one option for the function, have
not enumerating prefix/suffix at all.
The "r_i2c_pins_a" label is renamed to "r_i2c_pl89_pins" to fit our
current style. The node name "i2c" is also changed to "r-i2c-pl89-pins"
to match. The reason for the peculiar name is that the other option for
muxing R_I2C is on the PL0/PL1 pins, so the name has to mention the pin
numbers in addition to the pingroup.
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
1b6ff1cb Tue Aug 28 05:01:32 CDT 2018 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Rename r_i2c_pins_a label to r_i2c_pl89_pins
The pinmux name and label for a specific function should denote which
pingroup it is on, or if there is only one option for the function, have
not enumerating prefix/suffix at all.
The "r_i2c_pins_a" label is renamed to "r_i2c_pl89_pins" to fit our
current style. The node name "i2c" is also changed to "r-i2c-pl89-pins"
to match. The reason for the peculiar name is that the other option for
muxing R_I2C is on the PL0/PL1 pins, so the name has to mention the pin
numbers in addition to the pingroup.
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|