Searched hist:"19 bb33c7" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ |
| H A D | i915_gem_gtt.h | 19bb33c7 Wed Jul 11 02:36:02 CDT 2018 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Introduce i915_address_space.mutex
Add a mutex into struct i915_address_space to be used while operating on
the vma and their lists for a particular vm. As this may be called from
the shrinker, we taint the mutex with fs_reclaim so that from the start
lockdep warns us if we are caught holding the mutex across an
allocation. (With such small steps we will eventually rid ourselves of
struct_mutex recursion!)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180711073608.20286-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
19bb33c7 Wed Jul 11 02:36:02 CDT 2018 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Introduce i915_address_space.mutex
Add a mutex into struct i915_address_space to be used while operating on
the vma and their lists for a particular vm. As this may be called from
the shrinker, we taint the mutex with fs_reclaim so that from the start
lockdep warns us if we are caught holding the mutex across an
allocation. (With such small steps we will eventually rid ourselves of
struct_mutex recursion!)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180711073608.20286-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| H A D | i915_gem_gtt.c | 19bb33c7 Wed Jul 11 02:36:02 CDT 2018 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Introduce i915_address_space.mutex
Add a mutex into struct i915_address_space to be used while operating on
the vma and their lists for a particular vm. As this may be called from
the shrinker, we taint the mutex with fs_reclaim so that from the start
lockdep warns us if we are caught holding the mutex across an
allocation. (With such small steps we will eventually rid ourselves of
struct_mutex recursion!)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180711073608.20286-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
19bb33c7 Wed Jul 11 02:36:02 CDT 2018 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Introduce i915_address_space.mutex
Add a mutex into struct i915_address_space to be used while operating on
the vma and their lists for a particular vm. As this may be called from
the shrinker, we taint the mutex with fs_reclaim so that from the start
lockdep warns us if we are caught holding the mutex across an
allocation. (With such small steps we will eventually rid ourselves of
struct_mutex recursion!)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180711073608.20286-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
| H A D | i915_drv.h | 19bb33c7 Wed Jul 11 02:36:02 CDT 2018 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Introduce i915_address_space.mutex
Add a mutex into struct i915_address_space to be used while operating on
the vma and their lists for a particular vm. As this may be called from
the shrinker, we taint the mutex with fs_reclaim so that from the start
lockdep warns us if we are caught holding the mutex across an
allocation. (With such small steps we will eventually rid ourselves of
struct_mutex recursion!)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180711073608.20286-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
19bb33c7 Wed Jul 11 02:36:02 CDT 2018 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Introduce i915_address_space.mutex
Add a mutex into struct i915_address_space to be used while operating on
the vma and their lists for a particular vm. As this may be called from
the shrinker, we taint the mutex with fs_reclaim so that from the start
lockdep warns us if we are caught holding the mutex across an
allocation. (With such small steps we will eventually rid ourselves of
struct_mutex recursion!)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180711073608.20286-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|