Searched hist:"18 d758a2" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/trace/events/ |
| H A D | btrfs.h | 18d758a2 Thu Feb 16 23:37:03 CST 2023 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a fixed u64 value
In btrfs_io_context structure, we have a pointer raid_map, which
indicates the logical bytenr for each stripe.
But considering we always call sort_parity_stripes(), the result
raid_map[] is always sorted, thus raid_map[0] is always the logical
bytenr of the full stripe.
So why we waste the space and time (for sorting) for raid_map?
This patch will replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a single u64
number, full_stripe_start, by:
- Replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[0] to use full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[i] to compare with nr_data_stripes.
The benefits are:
- Less memory wasted on raid_map
It's sizeof(u64) * num_stripes vs sizeof(u64).
It'll always save at least one u64, and the benefit grows larger with
num_stripes.
- No more weird alloc_btrfs_io_context() behavior
As there is only one fixed size + one variable length array.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | raid56.c | 18d758a2 Thu Feb 16 23:37:03 CST 2023 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a fixed u64 value
In btrfs_io_context structure, we have a pointer raid_map, which
indicates the logical bytenr for each stripe.
But considering we always call sort_parity_stripes(), the result
raid_map[] is always sorted, thus raid_map[0] is always the logical
bytenr of the full stripe.
So why we waste the space and time (for sorting) for raid_map?
This patch will replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a single u64
number, full_stripe_start, by:
- Replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[0] to use full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[i] to compare with nr_data_stripes.
The benefits are:
- Less memory wasted on raid_map
It's sizeof(u64) * num_stripes vs sizeof(u64).
It'll always save at least one u64, and the benefit grows larger with
num_stripes.
- No more weird alloc_btrfs_io_context() behavior
As there is only one fixed size + one variable length array.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | volumes.h | 18d758a2 Thu Feb 16 23:37:03 CST 2023 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a fixed u64 value
In btrfs_io_context structure, we have a pointer raid_map, which
indicates the logical bytenr for each stripe.
But considering we always call sort_parity_stripes(), the result
raid_map[] is always sorted, thus raid_map[0] is always the logical
bytenr of the full stripe.
So why we waste the space and time (for sorting) for raid_map?
This patch will replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a single u64
number, full_stripe_start, by:
- Replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[0] to use full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[i] to compare with nr_data_stripes.
The benefits are:
- Less memory wasted on raid_map
It's sizeof(u64) * num_stripes vs sizeof(u64).
It'll always save at least one u64, and the benefit grows larger with
num_stripes.
- No more weird alloc_btrfs_io_context() behavior
As there is only one fixed size + one variable length array.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | scrub.c | 18d758a2 Thu Feb 16 23:37:03 CST 2023 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a fixed u64 value
In btrfs_io_context structure, we have a pointer raid_map, which
indicates the logical bytenr for each stripe.
But considering we always call sort_parity_stripes(), the result
raid_map[] is always sorted, thus raid_map[0] is always the logical
bytenr of the full stripe.
So why we waste the space and time (for sorting) for raid_map?
This patch will replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a single u64
number, full_stripe_start, by:
- Replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[0] to use full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[i] to compare with nr_data_stripes.
The benefits are:
- Less memory wasted on raid_map
It's sizeof(u64) * num_stripes vs sizeof(u64).
It'll always save at least one u64, and the benefit grows larger with
num_stripes.
- No more weird alloc_btrfs_io_context() behavior
As there is only one fixed size + one variable length array.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | volumes.c | 18d758a2 Thu Feb 16 23:37:03 CST 2023 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a fixed u64 value
In btrfs_io_context structure, we have a pointer raid_map, which
indicates the logical bytenr for each stripe.
But considering we always call sort_parity_stripes(), the result
raid_map[] is always sorted, thus raid_map[0] is always the logical
bytenr of the full stripe.
So why we waste the space and time (for sorting) for raid_map?
This patch will replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with a single u64
number, full_stripe_start, by:
- Replace btrfs_io_context::raid_map with full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[0] to use full_stripe_start
- Replace call sites using raid_map[i] to compare with nr_data_stripes.
The benefits are:
- Less memory wasted on raid_map
It's sizeof(u64) * num_stripes vs sizeof(u64).
It'll always save at least one u64, and the benefit grows larger with
num_stripes.
- No more weird alloc_btrfs_io_context() behavior
As there is only one fixed size + one variable length array.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|