Searched hist:"1863 d77f" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/sunrpc/ |
| H A D | cache.h | 1863d77f Mon Oct 01 09:41:52 CDT 2018 Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com> SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock
Now that the reader functions are all RCU protected, use a regular
spinlock rather than a reader/writer lock.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
1863d77f Mon Oct 01 09:41:52 CDT 2018 Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com> SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock
Now that the reader functions are all RCU protected, use a regular
spinlock rather than a reader/writer lock.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/sunrpc/ |
| H A D | cache.c | 1863d77f Mon Oct 01 09:41:52 CDT 2018 Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com> SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock
Now that the reader functions are all RCU protected, use a regular
spinlock rather than a reader/writer lock.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
1863d77f Mon Oct 01 09:41:52 CDT 2018 Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com> SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock
Now that the reader functions are all RCU protected, use a regular
spinlock rather than a reader/writer lock.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|