Searched hist:"0 b207d02" (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/block/ |
| H A D | rbd.c | 0b207d02 Wed Sep 20 12:01:03 CDT 2023 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> rbd: take header_rwsem in rbd_dev_refresh() only when updating
rbd_dev_refresh() has been holding header_rwsem across header and
parent info read-in unnecessarily for ages. With commit 870611e4877e
("rbd: get snapshot context after exclusive lock is ensured to be
held"), the potential for deadlocks became much more real owning to
a) header_rwsem now nesting inside lock_rwsem and b) rw_semaphores
not allowing new readers after a writer is registered.
For example, assuming that I/O request 1, I/O request 2 and header
read-in request all target the same OSD:
1. I/O request 1 comes in and gets submitted
2. watch error occurs
3. rbd_watch_errcb() takes lock_rwsem for write, clears owner_cid and
releases lock_rwsem
4. after reestablishing the watch, rbd_reregister_watch() calls
rbd_dev_refresh() which takes header_rwsem for write and submits
a header read-in request
5. I/O request 2 comes in: after taking lock_rwsem for read in
__rbd_img_handle_request(), it blocks trying to take header_rwsem
for read in rbd_img_object_requests()
6. another watch error occurs
7. rbd_watch_errcb() blocks trying to take lock_rwsem for write
8. I/O request 1 completion is received by the messenger but can't be
processed because lock_rwsem won't be granted anymore
9. header read-in request completion can't be received, let alone
processed, because the messenger is stranded
Change rbd_dev_refresh() to take header_rwsem only for actually
updating rbd_dev->header. Header and parent info read-in don't need
any locking.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 0b035401c570: rbd: move rbd_dev_refresh() definition
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 510a7330c82a: rbd: decouple header read-in from updating rbd_dev->header
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # c10311776f0a: rbd: decouple parent info read-in from updating rbd_dev
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 870611e4877e ("rbd: get snapshot context after exclusive lock is ensured to be held")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>
|