Searched hist:"0 afa5ca8" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/proc/ |
| H A D | inode.c | 0afa5ca8 Wed Feb 19 17:17:34 CST 2020 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes
I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based
inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when
this field is already here and serving the same purporse.
Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that
it is no longer sysctl specific.
Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when
proc_inode is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
0afa5ca8 Wed Feb 19 17:17:34 CST 2020 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes
I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based
inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when
this field is already here and serving the same purporse.
Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that
it is no longer sysctl specific.
Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when
proc_inode is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
|
| H A D | internal.h | 0afa5ca8 Wed Feb 19 17:17:34 CST 2020 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes
I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based
inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when
this field is already here and serving the same purporse.
Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that
it is no longer sysctl specific.
Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when
proc_inode is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
0afa5ca8 Wed Feb 19 17:17:34 CST 2020 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes
I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based
inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when
this field is already here and serving the same purporse.
Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that
it is no longer sysctl specific.
Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when
proc_inode is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
|
| H A D | proc_sysctl.c | 0afa5ca8 Wed Feb 19 17:17:34 CST 2020 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes
I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based
inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when
this field is already here and serving the same purporse.
Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that
it is no longer sysctl specific.
Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when
proc_inode is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
0afa5ca8 Wed Feb 19 17:17:34 CST 2020 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes
I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based
inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when
this field is already here and serving the same purporse.
Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that
it is no longer sysctl specific.
Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when
proc_inode is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
|