Searched hist:"0078117 c" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/nfsd/ |
| H A D | nfs4proc.c | 0078117c Wed Nov 15 11:30:27 CST 2017 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfsd: return RESOURCE not GARBAGE_ARGS on too many ops
A client that sends more than a hundred ops in a single compound
currently gets an rpc-level GARBAGE_ARGS error.
It would be more helpful to return NFS4ERR_RESOURCE, since that gives
the client a better idea how to recover (for example by splitting up the
compound into smaller compounds).
This is all a bit academic since we've never actually seen a reason for
clients to send such long compounds, but we may as well fix it.
While we're there, just use NFSD4_MAX_OPS_PER_COMPOUND == 16, the
constant we already use in the 4.1 case, instead of hard-coding 100.
Chances anyone actually uses even 16 ops per compound are small enough
that I think there's a neglible risk or any regression.
This fixes pynfs test COMP6.
Reported-by: "Lu, Xinyu" <luxy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
0078117c Wed Nov 15 11:30:27 CST 2017 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfsd: return RESOURCE not GARBAGE_ARGS on too many ops
A client that sends more than a hundred ops in a single compound
currently gets an rpc-level GARBAGE_ARGS error.
It would be more helpful to return NFS4ERR_RESOURCE, since that gives
the client a better idea how to recover (for example by splitting up the
compound into smaller compounds).
This is all a bit academic since we've never actually seen a reason for
clients to send such long compounds, but we may as well fix it.
While we're there, just use NFSD4_MAX_OPS_PER_COMPOUND == 16, the
constant we already use in the 4.1 case, instead of hard-coding 100.
Chances anyone actually uses even 16 ops per compound are small enough
that I think there's a neglible risk or any regression.
This fixes pynfs test COMP6.
Reported-by: "Lu, Xinyu" <luxy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | nfs4xdr.c | 0078117c Wed Nov 15 11:30:27 CST 2017 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfsd: return RESOURCE not GARBAGE_ARGS on too many ops
A client that sends more than a hundred ops in a single compound
currently gets an rpc-level GARBAGE_ARGS error.
It would be more helpful to return NFS4ERR_RESOURCE, since that gives
the client a better idea how to recover (for example by splitting up the
compound into smaller compounds).
This is all a bit academic since we've never actually seen a reason for
clients to send such long compounds, but we may as well fix it.
While we're there, just use NFSD4_MAX_OPS_PER_COMPOUND == 16, the
constant we already use in the 4.1 case, instead of hard-coding 100.
Chances anyone actually uses even 16 ops per compound are small enough
that I think there's a neglible risk or any regression.
This fixes pynfs test COMP6.
Reported-by: "Lu, Xinyu" <luxy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
0078117c Wed Nov 15 11:30:27 CST 2017 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> nfsd: return RESOURCE not GARBAGE_ARGS on too many ops
A client that sends more than a hundred ops in a single compound
currently gets an rpc-level GARBAGE_ARGS error.
It would be more helpful to return NFS4ERR_RESOURCE, since that gives
the client a better idea how to recover (for example by splitting up the
compound into smaller compounds).
This is all a bit academic since we've never actually seen a reason for
clients to send such long compounds, but we may as well fix it.
While we're there, just use NFSD4_MAX_OPS_PER_COMPOUND == 16, the
constant we already use in the 4.1 case, instead of hard-coding 100.
Chances anyone actually uses even 16 ops per compound are small enough
that I think there's a neglible risk or any regression.
This fixes pynfs test COMP6.
Reported-by: "Lu, Xinyu" <luxy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|