#include #include #include "gtest/gtest.h" // There is a surprising amount of slop in the math, // thanks to all the rounding and conversion. // The "x" byte value can drift by up to 2 away, I have seen. static constexpr int8_t expectedSlopX = 2; // Unlike expectedSlopX, this is a ratio, not an integer // It scales based on the range of "y" static constexpr double expectedSlopY = 0.01; // The algorithm here was copied from ipmitool // sdr_convert_sensor_reading() function // https://github.com/ipmitool/ipmitool/blob/42a023ff0726c80e8cc7d30315b987fe568a981d/lib/ipmi_sdr.c#L360 double ipmitool_y_from_x(uint8_t x, int m, int k2_rExp, int b, int k1_bExp, bool bSigned) { double result; // Rename to exactly match names and types (except analog) from ipmitool uint8_t val = x; double k1 = k1_bExp; double k2 = k2_rExp; int analog = bSigned ? 2 : 0; // Begin paste here // Only change is to comment out complicated structure in switch statement switch (/*sensor->cmn.unit.*/ analog) { case 0: result = (double)(((m * val) + (b * pow(10, k1))) * pow(10, k2)); break; case 1: if (val & 0x80) val++; /* Deliberately fall through to case 2. */ case 2: result = (double)(((m * (int8_t)val) + (b * pow(10, k1))) * pow(10, k2)); break; default: /* Oops! This isn't an analog sensor. */ return 0.0; } // End paste here // Ignoring linearization curves and postprocessing that follows, // assuming all sensors are perfectly linear return result; } void testValue(int x, double y, int16_t M, int8_t rExp, int16_t B, int8_t bExp, bool bSigned, double yRange) { double yRoundtrip; int result; // There is intentionally no exception catching here, // because if getSensorAttributes() returned true, // it is a promise that all of these should work. if (bSigned) { int8_t expect = x; int8_t actual = ipmi::scaleIPMIValueFromDouble(y, M, rExp, B, bExp, bSigned); result = actual; yRoundtrip = ipmitool_y_from_x(actual, M, rExp, B, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_NEAR(actual, expect, expectedSlopX); } else { uint8_t expect = x; uint8_t actual = ipmi::scaleIPMIValueFromDouble(y, M, rExp, B, bExp, bSigned); result = actual; yRoundtrip = ipmitool_y_from_x(actual, M, rExp, B, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_NEAR(actual, expect, expectedSlopX); } // Scale the amount of allowed slop in y based on range, so ratio similar double yTolerance = yRange * expectedSlopY; double yError = std::abs(y - yRoundtrip); EXPECT_NEAR(y, yRoundtrip, yTolerance); char szFormat[1024]; sprintf(szFormat, "Value | xExpect %4d | xResult %4d " "| M %5d | rExp %3d " "| B %5d | bExp %3d | bSigned %1d | y %18.3f | yRoundtrip %18.3f\n", x, result, M, (int)rExp, B, (int)bExp, (int)bSigned, y, yRoundtrip); std::cout << szFormat; } void testBounds(double yMin, double yMax, bool bExpectedOutcome = true) { int16_t mValue; int8_t rExp; int16_t bValue; int8_t bExp; bool bSigned; bool result; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(yMax, yMin, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, bExpectedOutcome); if (!result) { return; } char szFormat[1024]; sprintf(szFormat, "Bounds | yMin %18.3f | yMax %18.3f | M %5d" " | rExp %3d | B %5d | bExp %3d | bSigned %1d\n", yMin, yMax, mValue, (int)rExp, bValue, (int)bExp, (int)bSigned); std::cout << szFormat; double y50p = (yMin + yMax) / 2.0; // Average the average double y25p = (yMin + y50p) / 2.0; double y75p = (y50p + yMax) / 2.0; // This range value is only used for tolerance checking, not computation double yRange = yMax - yMin; if (bSigned) { int8_t xMin = -128; int8_t x25p = -64; int8_t x50p = 0; int8_t x75p = 64; int8_t xMax = 127; testValue(xMin, yMin, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); testValue(x25p, y25p, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); testValue(x50p, y50p, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); testValue(x75p, y75p, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); testValue(xMax, yMax, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); } else { uint8_t xMin = 0; uint8_t x25p = 64; uint8_t x50p = 128; uint8_t x75p = 192; uint8_t xMax = 255; testValue(xMin, yMin, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); testValue(x25p, y25p, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); testValue(x50p, y50p, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); testValue(x75p, y75p, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); testValue(xMax, yMax, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned, yRange); } } void testRanges(void) { // The ranges from the main TEST function testBounds(0x0, 0xFF); testBounds(-128, 127); testBounds(0, 16000); testBounds(0, 20); testBounds(8000, 16000); testBounds(-10, 10); testBounds(0, 277); testBounds(0, 0, false); testBounds(10, 12); // Additional test cases recommended to me by hardware people testBounds(-40, 150); testBounds(0, 1); testBounds(0, 2); testBounds(0, 4); testBounds(0, 8); testBounds(35, 65); testBounds(0, 18); testBounds(0, 25); testBounds(0, 80); testBounds(0, 500); // Additional sanity checks testBounds(0, 255); testBounds(-255, 0); testBounds(-255, 255); testBounds(0, 1000); testBounds(-1000, 0); testBounds(-1000, 1000); testBounds(0, 255000); testBounds(-128000000, 127000000); testBounds(-50000, 0); testBounds(-40000, 10000); testBounds(-30000, 20000); testBounds(-20000, 30000); testBounds(-10000, 40000); testBounds(0, 50000); testBounds(-1e3, 1e6); testBounds(-1e6, 1e3); // Extreme ranges are now possible testBounds(0, 1e10); testBounds(0, 1e11); testBounds(0, 1e12); testBounds(0, 1e13, false); testBounds(-1e10, 0); testBounds(-1e11, 0); testBounds(-1e12, 0); testBounds(-1e13, 0, false); testBounds(-1e9, 1e9); testBounds(-1e10, 1e10); testBounds(-1e11, 1e11); testBounds(-1e12, 1e12, false); // Large multiplier but small offset testBounds(1e4, 1e4 + 255); testBounds(1e5, 1e5 + 255); testBounds(1e6, 1e6 + 255); testBounds(1e7, 1e7 + 255); testBounds(1e8, 1e8 + 255); testBounds(1e9, 1e9 + 255); testBounds(1e10, 1e10 + 255, false); // Input validation against garbage testBounds(0, INFINITY, false); testBounds(-INFINITY, 0, false); testBounds(-INFINITY, INFINITY, false); testBounds(0, NAN, false); testBounds(NAN, 0, false); testBounds(NAN, NAN, false); // Noteworthy binary integers testBounds(0, std::pow(2.0, 32.0) - 1.0); testBounds(0, std::pow(2.0, 32.0)); testBounds(0.0 - std::pow(2.0, 31.0), std::pow(2.0, 31.0)); testBounds((0.0 - std::pow(2.0, 31.0)) - 1.0, std::pow(2.0, 31.0)); // Similar but negative (note additional commented-out below) testBounds(-1e1, (-1e1) + 255); testBounds(-1e2, (-1e2) + 255); // Ranges of negative numbers (note additional commented-out below) testBounds(-10400, -10000); testBounds(-15000, -14000); testBounds(-10000, -9000); testBounds(-1000, -900); testBounds(-1000, -800); testBounds(-1000, -700); testBounds(-1000, -740); // Very small ranges (note additional commented-out below) testBounds(0, 0.1); testBounds(0, 0.01); testBounds(0, 0.001); testBounds(0, 0.0001); testBounds(0, 0.000001, false); #if 0 // TODO(): The algorithm in this module is better than it was before, // but the resulting value of X is still wrong under certain conditions, // such as when the range between min and max is around 255, // and the offset is fairly extreme compared to the multiplier. // Not sure why this is, but these ranges are contrived, // and real-world examples would most likely never be this way. testBounds(-10290, -10000); testBounds(-10280, -10000); testBounds(-10275,-10000); testBounds(-10270,-10000); testBounds(-10265,-10000); testBounds(-10260,-10000); testBounds(-10255,-10000); testBounds(-10250,-10000); testBounds(-10245,-10000); testBounds(-10256,-10000); testBounds(-10512, -10000); testBounds(-11024, -10000); // TODO(): This also fails, due to extreme small range, loss of precision testBounds(0, 0.00001); // TODO(): Interestingly, if bSigned is forced false, // causing "x" to have range of (0,255) instead of (-128,127), // these test cases change from failing to passing! // Not sure why this is, perhaps a mathematician might know. testBounds(-10300, -10000); testBounds(-1000,-750); testBounds(-1e3, (-1e3) + 255); testBounds(-1e4, (-1e4) + 255); testBounds(-1e5, (-1e5) + 255); testBounds(-1e6, (-1e6) + 255); #endif } TEST(sensorutils, TranslateToIPMI) { /*bool getSensorAttributes(double maxValue, double minValue, int16_t &mValue, int8_t &rExp, int16_t &bValue, int8_t &bExp, bool &bSigned); */ // normal unsigned sensor double maxValue = 0xFF; double minValue = 0x0; int16_t mValue; int8_t rExp; int16_t bValue; int8_t bExp; bool bSigned; bool result; uint8_t scaledVal; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, true); if (result) { EXPECT_EQ(bSigned, false); EXPECT_EQ(mValue, 1); EXPECT_EQ(rExp, 0); EXPECT_EQ(bValue, 0); EXPECT_EQ(bExp, 0); } double expected = 0x50; scaledVal = ipmi::scaleIPMIValueFromDouble(0x50, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_NEAR(scaledVal, expected, expected * 0.01); // normal signed sensor maxValue = 127; minValue = -128; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, true); if (result) { EXPECT_EQ(bSigned, true); EXPECT_EQ(mValue, 1); EXPECT_EQ(rExp, 0); EXPECT_EQ(bValue, 0); EXPECT_EQ(bExp, 0); } // check negative values expected = 236; // 2s compliment -20 scaledVal = ipmi::scaleIPMIValueFromDouble(-20, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_NEAR(scaledVal, expected, expected * 0.01); // fan example maxValue = 16000; minValue = 0; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, true); if (result) { EXPECT_EQ(bSigned, false); EXPECT_EQ(mValue, floor((16000.0 / 0xFF) + 0.5)); EXPECT_EQ(rExp, 0); EXPECT_EQ(bValue, 0); EXPECT_EQ(bExp, 0); } // voltage sensor example maxValue = 20; minValue = 0; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, true); if (result) { EXPECT_EQ(bSigned, false); EXPECT_EQ(mValue, floor(((20.0 / 0xFF) / std::pow(10, rExp)) + 0.5)); EXPECT_EQ(rExp, -3); EXPECT_EQ(bValue, 0); EXPECT_EQ(bExp, 0); } scaledVal = ipmi::scaleIPMIValueFromDouble(12.2, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); expected = 12.2 / (mValue * std::pow(10, rExp)); EXPECT_NEAR(scaledVal, expected, expected * 0.01); // shifted fan example maxValue = 16000; minValue = 8000; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, true); if (result) { EXPECT_EQ(bSigned, false); EXPECT_EQ(mValue, floor(((8000.0 / 0xFF) / std::pow(10, rExp)) + 0.5)); EXPECT_EQ(rExp, -1); EXPECT_EQ(bValue, 8); EXPECT_EQ(bExp, 4); } // signed voltage sensor example maxValue = 10; minValue = -10; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, true); if (result) { EXPECT_EQ(bSigned, true); EXPECT_EQ(mValue, floor(((20.0 / 0xFF) / std::pow(10, rExp)) + 0.5)); EXPECT_EQ(rExp, -3); // Although this seems like a weird magic number, // it is because the range (-128,127) is not symmetrical about zero, // unlike the range (-10,10), so this introduces some distortion. EXPECT_EQ(bValue, 392); EXPECT_EQ(bExp, -1); } scaledVal = ipmi::scaleIPMIValueFromDouble(5, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); expected = 5 / (mValue * std::pow(10, rExp)); EXPECT_NEAR(scaledVal, expected, expected * 0.01); // reading = max example maxValue = 277; minValue = 0; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, true); if (result) { EXPECT_EQ(bSigned, false); } scaledVal = ipmi::scaleIPMIValueFromDouble(maxValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); expected = 0xFF; EXPECT_NEAR(scaledVal, expected, expected * 0.01); // 0, 0 failure maxValue = 0; minValue = 0; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, false); // too close *success* (was previously failure!) maxValue = 12; minValue = 10; result = ipmi::getSensorAttributes(maxValue, minValue, mValue, rExp, bValue, bExp, bSigned); EXPECT_EQ(result, true); if (result) { EXPECT_EQ(bSigned, false); EXPECT_EQ(mValue, floor(((2.0 / 0xFF) / std::pow(10, rExp)) + 0.5)); EXPECT_EQ(rExp, -4); EXPECT_EQ(bValue, 1); EXPECT_EQ(bExp, 5); } } TEST(sensorUtils, TestRanges) { // Additional test ranges, each running through a series of values, // to make sure the values of "x" and "y" go together and make sense, // for the resulting scaling attributes from each range. // Unlike the TranslateToIPMI test, exact matches of the // getSensorAttributes() results (the coefficients) are not required, // because they are tested through actual use, relating "x" to "y". testRanges(); }