Lines Matching full:they

10 patch submissions they make to the project. To put it another way,
11 contributors must indicate that they are legally permitted to contribute to
62 If the person sending the mail is not one of the patch authors, they are
73   * The non-primary author's contributions were so trivial that they can be
93 When multiple ``Signed-off-by`` tags are present, they should be strictly kept
103    mailing list, if they consider the patch acceptable, they should send an
105    review a patch should add this even if they are also adding their
110    queue it and send a pull request, they would send a mail containing a
113    maintainer wants to indicate they have done a full review they should use
117    behaviour of the patch in some manner, they should send an email reply
135 the normal code review points, they are expected to validate the presence of
138 At the time they queue the patch in their subsystem tree, the maintainer
139 **must** also then add their own ``Signed-off-by`` to indicate that they have
143 When the maintainer modifies the patch after pulling into their tree, they
229 know you are interested in taking over their work, in case they still intended
307 copyright and license status of content they are contributing to QEMU. With AI