Lines Matching refs:dest

660 +void ff_vc1_inv_trans_8x4_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
661 +void ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x8_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
662 +void ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x4_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
664 +void ff_vc1_inv_trans_8x8_dc_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
665 +void ff_vc1_inv_trans_8x4_dc_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
666 +void ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x8_dc_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
667 +void ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x4_dc_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
17106 void ff_vc1_inv_trans_8x4_dc_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
17107 void ff_vc1_inv_trans_4x4_dc_neon(uint8_t *dest, ptrdiff_t stride, int16_t *block);
30977 + add r0, r0, r1 ; mov ra_dest, unif # Add stripe offsets ; dest addr
35262 + // current dest block and mono-pred.
46636 + AVFrame * const dest = &dest_frame;
46640 + dest->format = src->format;
46641 + dest->width = src->width;
46642 + dest->height = src->height;
46644 + if (av_rpi_zc_get_buffer(zc, dest) != 0 ||
46645 + av_rpi_zc_resolve_frame(dest, ZC_RESOLVE_ALLOC_VALID) != 0)
46650 + for (i = 0, psrc = src->data[0], pdest = dest->data[0];
46651 + i != dest->height;
46652 + ++i, psrc += src->linesize[0], pdest += dest->linesize[0])
46654 + memcpy(pdest, psrc, dest->width);
46656 + for (i = 0, psrc = src->data[1], pdest = dest->data[1];
46657 + i != dest->height / 2;
46658 + ++i, psrc += src->linesize[1], pdest += dest->linesize[1])
46660 + memcpy(pdest, psrc, dest->width / 2);
46662 + for (i = 0, psrc = src->data[2], pdest = dest->data[2];
46663 + i != dest->height / 2;
46664 + ++i, psrc += src->linesize[2], pdest += dest->linesize[2])
46666 + memcpy(pdest, psrc, dest->width / 2);
46669 + return dest->buf[0];
52933 +// NQ_DRAINING At EOS, dQ dest until EOS there too
63027 +// uint8_t * dest, : x0
63440 +// uint8_t * dest,
63451 +// uint8_t * dest, : x0
63462 +// within the stripe is OK. However it does respect the dest size for wri
63616 +// uint8_t * dest, : x0
63627 +// within the stripe is OK. However it does respect the dest size for wri
63814 +void ff_rpi_sand8_lines_to_planar_y8(uint8_t * dest, unsigned int dst_stride,
63823 +void ff_rpi_sand30_lines_to_planar_y16(uint8_t * dest, unsigned int dst_stride,
63831 +void ff_rpi_sand30_lines_to_planar_y8(uint8_t * dest, unsigned int dst_stride,
63888 +@ for dest address than it is to have 2 used alternately (On Pi3 Ben asserted
63894 +@ it is possible that dest isn't (converting to .yuv or other packed format).
63904 +@ uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
63942 +@ uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
63953 +@ within the stripe is OK. However it does respect the dest size for writing
64055 +@ within the stripe is OK. However it does respect the dest size for writing
64192 +@ uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
64203 +@ within the stripe is OK. However it does respect the dest size for writing
64336 +@ within the stripe is OK. However it does respect the dest size for writing
64471 +@ uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
64482 +@ within the stripe is OK. However it does respect the dest size for writing
64607 +@ uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
64618 +@ within the stripe is OK. However it does respect the dest size for wri
64810 + uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
64816 + uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
64840 + uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
64864 + uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
64875 + uint8_t * dest, // [r0]
65811 + // As we have the same stride1 for src & dest and src is wider than dest
65812 + // then if we loop on src we can always write contiguously to dest
65814 + // as we will always have storage in dest for that
65841 + // Fix up a trailing dest half stripe