| ab76bc27 | 13-Sep-2019 |
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> |
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen: Rewrite compatibility considerations
We have some compatibility advice buried in sections "Enumeration
types" and "Struct types". Compatibility is actually about commands
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen: Rewrite compatibility considerations
We have some compatibility advice buried in sections "Enumeration
types" and "Struct types". Compatibility is actually about commands
and events. It devolves to the types used there. All kinds of types,
not just enumerations and structs.
Replace the existing advice by a new section "Compatibility
considerations".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-14-armbru@redhat.com>
[Squash in paragraph on invisible schema changes, as per Eric's review]
show more ...
|
| f5821f52 | 13-Sep-2019 |
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> |
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen: Reorder sections for readability
Section "QMP/Guest agent schema" starts with a brief introduction,
then subsection "Comments", then subsection "Schema overview" (more
elab
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen: Reorder sections for readability
Section "QMP/Guest agent schema" starts with a brief introduction,
then subsection "Comments", then subsection "Schema overview" (more
elaborate introduction), and only then talks about schema entities
like types, commands, and so forth.
Subsection "Comments" is long and tiring: almost 500 words, mostly
about doc comments. Move the doc comment part to its own subsection
"Documentation comments" at the very end of "QMP/Guest agent schema".
Subsection "Schema overview" explains naming rules at considerable
length: 250 words. Move this part to its own subsection "Naming rules
and reserved names" right after the subsections on schema entities.
Subsection "Enumeration types" is wedged between "Struct types" and
"Union types". Move it before "Struct types".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-13-armbru@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
| e24fe238 | 13-Sep-2019 |
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> |
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen: Minor specification fixes
The specification claims "Each expression that isn't an include
directive may be preceded by a documentation block", but the code also
rejects the
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen: Minor specification fixes
The specification claims "Each expression that isn't an include
directive may be preceded by a documentation block", but the code also
rejects them for pragma directives. The code is correct. Fix the
specification.
The specification reserves member names starting with 'has_', but the
code also reserves name 'u'. Fix the specification.
The specification claims "The string 'max' is not allowed as an enum
value". Untrue. Fix the specification. While there, delete the
naming advice, because it's redundant with the naming rules in section
"Schema overview"
The specification claims "No branch of the union can be named 'max',
as this would collide with the implicit enum". Untrue. Fix the
specification.
The specification claims "It is not allowed to name an event 'MAX',
since the generator also produces a C enumeration of all event names
with a generated _MAX value at the end." Untrue. Fix the
specification.
The specification claims "All branches of the union must be complex
types", but the code permits only struct types. The code is correct.
Fix the specification.
The specification claims a command's return type "must be the string
name of a complex or built-in type, a one-element array containing the
name of a complex or built-in type" unless the command is in pragma
'returns-whitelist'. The code does not permit built-in types. Fix
the specification.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-5-armbru@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
| f1b3ccfa | 13-Jun-2019 |
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> |
monitor: Move {hmp, qmp}.c to monitor/{hmp, qmp}-cmds.c
Now that we have a monitor/ subdirectory, let's move hmp.c and qmp.c
from the root directory there. As they contain implementations of
monitor
monitor: Move {hmp, qmp}.c to monitor/{hmp, qmp}-cmds.c
Now that we have a monitor/ subdirectory, let's move hmp.c and qmp.c
from the root directory there. As they contain implementations of
monitor commands, rename them to {hmp,qmp}-cmds.c, so that {hmp,qmp}.c
are free for the HMP and QMP infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190613153405.24769-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
| bb768f71 | 10-May-2019 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
Makefile: Fix inclusion of the config-devices.mak.d Kconfig dependencies
The Makefile tries to include device Kconfig dependencies via
-include $(SUBDIR_DEVICES_MAK_DEP)
and thus expects files th
Makefile: Fix inclusion of the config-devices.mak.d Kconfig dependencies
The Makefile tries to include device Kconfig dependencies via
-include $(SUBDIR_DEVICES_MAK_DEP)
and thus expects files that match *-softmmu/config-devices.mak.d ...
however, the minikconf script currently generates files a la
"*-softmmu-config.devices.mak.d" instead, so the dependency files
simply got ignored so far. For example, after a "touch hw/arm/Kconfig",
the arm-softmmu/config-devices.mak file is currently not re-generated.
Fix it by putting the dependency files in the *-softmmu folders now.
Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
| b910545f | 12-Mar-2019 |
Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com> |
tests/acceptance: look for target architecture in test tags first
A test can, optionally, be tagged for one or many architectures. If a
test has been tagged for a single architecture, there's a hig
tests/acceptance: look for target architecture in test tags first
A test can, optionally, be tagged for one or many architectures. If a
test has been tagged for a single architecture, there's a high chance
that the test won't run on other architectures. This changes the
default order of choosing a default target architecture to use based
on the 'arch' tag value first.
The precedence order is for choosing a QEMU binary to use for a test
is now:
* qemu_bin parameter
* arch parameter
* arch tag value (for example, x86_64 if ":avocado: tags=arch:x86_64
is used)
This means that if one runs:
$ avocado run -p qemu_bin=/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 test.py
No arch parameter or tag will influence the selection of the QEMU
target binary. If one runs:
$ avocado run -p arch=ppc64 test.py
The target binary selection mechanism will attempt to find a binary
such as "ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64". And finally, if one runs
a test that is tagged (in its docstring) with "arch:aarch64":
$ avocado run aarch64.py
The target binary selection mechanism will attempt to find a binary
such as "aarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64".
At this time, no provision is made to cancel the execution of tests if
the arch parameter given (manually) does not match the test "arch"
tag, but it may be a useful default behavior to be added in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190312171824.5134-7-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
show more ...
|