#
6f882c09 |
| 23-Feb-2022 |
Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> |
obmc-targets: remove RefuseManualStop
Per freedesktop.org, this option is "mostly a safety feature to ensure that the user does not accidentally activate units that are not intended to be activated
obmc-targets: remove RefuseManualStop
Per freedesktop.org, this option is "mostly a safety feature to ensure that the user does not accidentally activate units that are not intended to be activated explicitly".
There have been a few instances when doing some systemd debugging, that the ability to manually stop these targets would be useful. Given that the only users logged into the BMC should know what they're doing, this should not be much of a concern.
IBM has a tool called "istep" which can be used to boot the host firmware independently from the different openbmc targets and services. It's primarily used by the chip design and bringup team to have more fine grained control over the initialization of the host hardware. The problem with using istep is that it does not start any systemd targets to boot the host firmware, but it does depend on systemd targets to power the system off. The issue here is that if you don't start the targets to boot the system, their "Conflicts" will not stop the targets used to power down the system. When that doesn't happen, there is no synchronization provided by those targets because they are already running.
The solution will be to provide a shell script that istep (or any other independent boot application) can call to manually stop all the targets needs to synchronize the power off.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> Change-Id: Ic3bce98dc7ed2c6f57a78bb8ef590f1b447621ba
show more ...
|
#
964b9fc2 |
| 22-Jan-2021 |
Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> |
synch targets: ensure wants relationship Synchronization targets (i.e. targets that do not have services underneath them) require "Wants" relationships to ensure they are started and
synch targets: ensure wants relationship Synchronization targets (i.e. targets that do not have services underneath them) require "Wants" relationships to ensure they are started and utilized. In most cases a service using them as a synchronization target will ensure they are started but to be sure, this should be explicitly defined within the targets themselves. Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> Change-Id: I053d1aba3f1596267a3ad3dbc6450f77df8a9396
show more ...
|
#
34b3b407 |
| 06-May-2020 |
Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> |
multi-user: do not use wants relationship The multi-user target is run by systemd when the BMC first boots. It contains all of the initial startup services. Some OpenBMC targets want
multi-user: do not use wants relationship The multi-user target is run by systemd when the BMC first boots. It contains all of the initial startup services. Some OpenBMC targets want to ensure they are run after the multi-user target completes. A lot of these targets did both a Wants and After relationship with multi-user. The latest systemd, version 245, now takes that Wants relationship seriously and will start any services within multi-user that are stopped. This includes oneshot services which do not have the "RemainAfterExit=yes" clause. If these services only expected to be run once, as a part of multi-user, then they should include this clause but you can see how they may expected to have only been run once. The solution is twofold: 1) Fix the oneshot services that fall in the above scenario 2) Change the targets to not Wants=multi-user.target 1 will be changes throughout a few repositories. 2 is fixed in this commit. Resolves openbmc/phosphor-state-manager#14 Tested: Provided test image to George and he verified this fixed the above issue Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> Change-Id: I6eb7e5d2cb7d5a3c95f2e8ef6efc708dbb63fd52
show more ...
|
#
c101157e |
| 27-Jan-2020 |
Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> |
move openbmc targets into this repo OpenBMC is moving towards individual repos hosting and maintaining their own systemd files. This allows the corresponding maintainer more control
move openbmc targets into this repo OpenBMC is moving towards individual repos hosting and maintaining their own systemd files. This allows the corresponding maintainer more control over their systemd files and removes the meta-* layer maintainer from needing to be involved. The systemd targets defined and used by OpenBMC are implemented by phosphor-state-manager code and services so move them into this repository. Once this is merged, its bump will need to be combined with a change in the meta-phosphor layer that removes the target files. Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> Change-Id: I248bf79c95f66afefffcc152de79cd2791945819
show more ...
|