History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/jffs2/erase.c (Results 101 – 122 of 122)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# f116629d 26-Jun-2006 Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>

[PATCH] fs: use list_move()

This patch converts the combination of list_del(A) and list_add(A, B) to
list_move(A, B) under fs/.

Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Acked-by: Joe

[PATCH] fs: use list_move()

This patch converts the combination of list_del(A) and list_add(A, B) to
list_move(A, B) under fs/.

Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Acked-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiserfs-dev@namesys.com>
Cc: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.17-rc6
# 9bfeb691 26-May-2006 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Switch to using an array of jffs2_raw_node_refs instead of a list.

This allows us to drop another pointer from the struct jffs2_raw_node_ref,
shrinking it to 8 bytes on 32-bit ma

[JFFS2] Switch to using an array of jffs2_raw_node_refs instead of a list.

This allows us to drop another pointer from the struct jffs2_raw_node_ref,
shrinking it to 8 bytes on 32-bit machines (if the TEST_TOTLEN) paranoia
check is turned off, which will be committed soon).

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.17-rc5
# 046b8b98 24-May-2006 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Add 'jeb' argument to jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs()

Preallocation of refs is shortly going to be a per-eraseblock thing,
rather than per-filesystem. Add the required argument to

[JFFS2] Add 'jeb' argument to jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs()

Preallocation of refs is shortly going to be a per-eraseblock thing,
rather than per-filesystem. Add the required argument to the function.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

show more ...


# c38c1b61 24-May-2006 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] jffs2_free_all_node_refs() doesn't free them all. Rename it.

... to jffs2_free_jeb_node_refs() since that's what it does.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>


# 2f785402 23-May-2006 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Reduce visibility of raw_node_ref to upper layers of JFFS2 code.

As the first step towards eliminating the ref->next_phys member and saving
memory by using an _array_ of struct j

[JFFS2] Reduce visibility of raw_node_ref to upper layers of JFFS2 code.

As the first step towards eliminating the ref->next_phys member and saving
memory by using an _array_ of struct jffs2_raw_node_ref per eraseblock,
stop the write functions from allocating their own refs; have them just
_reserve_ the appropriate number instead. Then jffs2_link_node_ref() can
just fill them in.

Use a linked list of pre-allocated refs in the superblock, for now. Once
we switch to an array, it'll just be a case of extending that array.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

show more ...


# 0eac940b 22-May-2006 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Add some preemptive BUG checks for XATTR code

In a couple of places, we assume that what's at the end of the
->next_in_ino list is a struct jffs2_inode_cache. Let's check
for

[JFFS2] Add some preemptive BUG checks for XATTR code

In a couple of places, we assume that what's at the end of the
->next_in_ino list is a struct jffs2_inode_cache. Let's check
for that, since we expect it to change soon.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

show more ...


# fcb75787 22-May-2006 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Extend jffs2_link_node_ref() to link into per-inode list too.

Let's avoid the potential for forgetting to set ref->next_in_ino, by doing
it within jffs2_link_node_ref() instead.

[JFFS2] Extend jffs2_link_node_ref() to link into per-inode list too.

Let's avoid the potential for forgetting to set ref->next_in_ino, by doing
it within jffs2_link_node_ref() instead.

This highlights the ugliness of what we're currently doing with
xattr_datum and xattr_ref structures -- we should find a nicer way of
dealing with that.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

show more ...


# 7807ef7b 20-May-2006 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Fix summary handling of unknown but compatible nodes.

For RWCOMPAT and ROCOMPAT nodes, we should still allow the mount to
succeed. Just abandon the summary and fall through to th

[JFFS2] Fix summary handling of unknown but compatible nodes.

For RWCOMPAT and ROCOMPAT nodes, we should still allow the mount to
succeed. Just abandon the summary and fall through to the full scan.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

show more ...


# f1f9671b 20-May-2006 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Introduce jffs2_link_node_ref() function to reduce code duplication

The same sequence of code was repeated in many places, to add a new
struct jffs2_raw_node_ref to an eraseblock

[JFFS2] Introduce jffs2_link_node_ref() function to reduce code duplication

The same sequence of code was repeated in many places, to add a new
struct jffs2_raw_node_ref to an eraseblock and adjust the space accounting
accordingly. Move it out-of-line.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.17-rc4, v2.6.17-rc3, v2.6.17-rc2, v2.6.17-rc1, v2.6.16, v2.6.16-rc6, v2.6.16-rc5, v2.6.16-rc4, v2.6.16-rc3, v2.6.16-rc2, v2.6.16-rc1, v2.6.15, v2.6.15-rc7, v2.6.15-rc6, v2.6.15-rc5, v2.6.15-rc4, v2.6.15-rc3, v2.6.15-rc2, v2.6.15-rc1
# 182ec4ee 07-Nov-2005 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

[JFFS2] Clean up trailing white spaces

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>


Revision tags: v2.6.14, v2.6.14-rc5, v2.6.14-rc4, v2.6.14-rc3
# 733802d9 22-Sep-2005 Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Debug code simplification, update TODO

Simplify the debugging code further.
Update the TODO list

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-o

[JFFS2] Debug code simplification, update TODO

Simplify the debugging code further.
Update the TODO list

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.14-rc2, v2.6.14-rc1, v2.6.13, v2.6.13-rc7, v2.6.13-rc6, v2.6.13-rc5, v2.6.13-rc4
# e0c8e42f 24-Jul-2005 Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Debug code clean up - step 3

Various simplifiactions. printk format corrections.
Convert more code to use the new debug functions.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <de

[JFFS2] Debug code clean up - step 3

Various simplifiactions. printk format corrections.
Convert more code to use the new debug functions.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

show more ...


# 730554d9 17-Jul-2005 Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Debug code clean up - step 1

Move debug functions into a seperate source file

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner

[JFFS2] Debug code clean up - step 1

Move debug functions into a seperate source file

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

show more ...


# 5d157885 15-Jul-2005 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>

[JFFS2] Fix node allocation leak

In the rare case of failing to write the cleanmarker
the allocated node was not freed.

Pointed out by Forrest Zhao
Initial cleanup by Joern

[JFFS2] Fix node allocation leak

In the rare case of failing to write the cleanmarker
the allocated node was not freed.

Pointed out by Forrest Zhao
Initial cleanup by Joern Engel

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.13-rc3, v2.6.13-rc2, v2.6.13-rc1, v2.6.12, v2.6.12-rc6, v2.6.12-rc5
# 7d27c814 22-May-2005 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>

[JFFS2] Whitespace cleanup. Fix missing debug message

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>


Revision tags: v2.6.12-rc4
# 8cd79216 03-May-2005 Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Fix NOR only compile

Fix the bug that caouses problems when compiling for NOR.
We read a newly erased block so we don't need to check ECC.

Define jffs2_is_writebuffered

[JFFS2] Fix NOR only compile

Fix the bug that caouses problems when compiling for NOR.
We read a newly erased block so we don't need to check ECC.

Define jffs2_is_writebuffered as zero if there is no wbuf.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.12-rc3, v2.6.12-rc2
# 894214d1 05-Apr-2005 Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Fix race problems with wbuf.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>


# 437316d9 20-Mar-2005 Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Forbid to free inode_cache objects if its nlink isn't zero.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>


# 67e345d1 27-Feb-2005 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

[JFFS2] Prevent ino cache removal for inodes in use

Don't remove inocache for inodes which are in read_inode() or
clear_inode() until they're done.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhous

[JFFS2] Prevent ino cache removal for inodes in use

Don't remove inocache for inodes which are in read_inode() or
clear_inode() until they're done.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

show more ...


# 8f15fd55 09-Feb-2005 Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>

[JFFS2] Add support for JFFS2-on-Dataflash devices.

For Dataflash, can_mark_obsolete = false and the NAND write buffering
code (wbuf.c) is used.

Since the DataFlash chip will au

[JFFS2] Add support for JFFS2-on-Dataflash devices.

For Dataflash, can_mark_obsolete = false and the NAND write buffering
code (wbuf.c) is used.

Since the DataFlash chip will automatically erase pages when writing,
the cleanmarkers are not needed - so cleanmarker_oob = false and
cleanmarker_size = 0

DataFlash page-sizes are not a power of two (they're multiples of 528
bytes). The SECTOR_ADDR macro (added in the previous core patch) is
replaced with a (slower) div/mod version if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_DATAFLASH is
selected.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

show more ...


# 3be36675 09-Feb-2005 Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>

[JFFS2] Core changes required to support JFFS2-on-Dataflash devices.

DataFlash page-sizes are not a power of two (they're multiples of 528
bytes). There are a few places in JFFS2 code w

[JFFS2] Core changes required to support JFFS2-on-Dataflash devices.

DataFlash page-sizes are not a power of two (they're multiples of 528
bytes). There are a few places in JFFS2 code where sector_size is used
as a bitmask. A new macro (SECTOR_ADDR) was defined to calculate these
sector addresses. For non-DataFlash devices, the original (faster)
bitmask operation is still used.

In scan.c, the EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE was a constant of 1024.
Since this could be larger than the sector size of the DataFlash, this
is now basically set to MIN(sector_size, 1024).

Addition of a jffs2_is_writebuffered() macro.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

show more ...


# 1da177e4 16-Apr-2005 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>

Linux-2.6.12-rc2

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we

Linux-2.6.12-rc2

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!

show more ...


12345