History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/gfs2/lops.c (Results 101 – 125 of 316)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# d6a079e8 11-Mar-2011 Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

GFS2: introduce AIL lock

The log lock is currently used to protect the AIL lists and
the movements of buffers into and out of them. The lists
are self contained and no log specific items outside the

GFS2: introduce AIL lock

The log lock is currently used to protect the AIL lists and
the movements of buffers into and out of them. The lists
are self contained and no log specific items outside the
lists are accessed when starting or emptying the AIL lists.

Hence the operation of the AIL does not require the protection
of the log lock so split them out into a new AIL specific lock
to reduce the amount of traffic on the log lock. This will
also reduce the amount of serialisation that occurs when
the gfs2_logd pushes on the AIL to move it forward.

This reduces the impact of log pushing on sequential write
throughput.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


# 721a9602 09-Mar-2011 Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

block: kill off REQ_UNPLUG

With the plugging now being explicitly controlled by the
submitter, callers need not pass down unplugging hints
to the block layer. If they want to unplug, it's because th

block: kill off REQ_UNPLUG

With the plugging now being explicitly controlled by the
submitter, callers need not pass down unplugging hints
to the block layer. If they want to unplug, it's because they
manually plugged on their own - in which case, they should just
unplug at will.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.38-rc8, v2.6.38-rc7, v2.6.38-rc6, v2.6.38-rc5, v2.6.38-rc4, v2.6.38-rc3, v2.6.38-rc2
# bc015cb8 19-Jan-2011 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

GFS2: Use RCU for glock hash table

This has a number of advantages:

- Reduces contention on the hash table lock
- Makes the code smaller and simpler
- Should speed up glock dumps when under load

GFS2: Use RCU for glock hash table

This has a number of advantages:

- Reduces contention on the hash table lock
- Makes the code smaller and simpler
- Should speed up glock dumps when under load
- Removes ref count changing in examine_bucket
- No longer need hash chain lock in glock_put() in common case

There are some further changes which this enables and which
we may do in the future. One is to look at using SLAB_RCU,
and another is to look at using a per-cpu counter for the
per-sb glock counter, since that is touched twice in the
lifetime of each glock (but only used at umount time).

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.38-rc1, v2.6.37, v2.6.37-rc8, v2.6.37-rc7, v2.6.37-rc6, v2.6.37-rc5, v2.6.37-rc4, v2.6.37-rc3, v2.6.37-rc2, v2.6.37-rc1, v2.6.36, v2.6.36-rc8, v2.6.36-rc7, v2.6.36-rc6, v2.6.36-rc5, v2.6.36-rc4, v2.6.36-rc3, v2.6.36-rc2, v2.6.36-rc1, v2.6.35, v2.6.35-rc6, v2.6.35-rc5, v2.6.35-rc4, v2.6.35-rc3, v2.6.35-rc2, v2.6.35-rc1, v2.6.34, v2.6.34-rc7
# 5e687eac 04-May-2010 Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>

GFS2: Various gfs2_logd improvements

This patch contains various tweaks to how log flushes and active item writeback
work. gfs2_logd is now managed by a waitqueue, and gfs2_log_reseve now waits
for

GFS2: Various gfs2_logd improvements

This patch contains various tweaks to how log flushes and active item writeback
work. gfs2_logd is now managed by a waitqueue, and gfs2_log_reseve now waits
for gfs2_logd to do the log flushing. Multiple functions were rewritten to
remove the need to call gfs2_log_lock(). Instead of using one test to see if
gfs2_logd had work to do, there are now seperate tests to check if there
are two many buffers in the incore log or if there are two many items on the
active items list.

This patch is a port of a patch Steve Whitehouse wrote about a year ago, with
some minor changes. Since gfs2_ail1_start always submits all the active items,
it no longer needs to keep track of the first ai submitted, so this has been
removed. In gfs2_log_reserve(), the order of the calls to
prepare_to_wait_exclusive() and wake_up() when firing off the logd thread has
been switched. If it called wake_up first there was a small window for a race,
where logd could run and return before gfs2_log_reserve was ready to get woken
up. If gfs2_logd ran, but did not free up enough blocks, gfs2_log_reserve()
would be left waiting for gfs2_logd to eventualy run because it timed out.
Finally, gt_logd_secs, which controls how long to wait before gfs2_logd times
out, and flushes the log, can now be set on mount with ar_commit.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.34-rc6, v2.6.34-rc5, v2.6.34-rc4, v2.6.34-rc3, v2.6.34-rc2, v2.6.34-rc1, v2.6.33, v2.6.33-rc8, v2.6.33-rc7
# e5884636 04-Feb-2010 Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

GFS2: ordered writes are backwards

When we queue data buffers for ordered write, the buffers are added
to the head of the ordered write list. When the log needs to push
these buffers to disk, it als

GFS2: ordered writes are backwards

When we queue data buffers for ordered write, the buffers are added
to the head of the ordered write list. When the log needs to push
these buffers to disk, it also walks the list from the head. The
result is that the the ordered buffers are submitted to disk in
reverse order.

For large writes, this means that whenever the log flushes large
streams of reverse sequential order buffers are pushed down into the
block layers. The elevators don't handle this particularly well, so
IO rates tend to be significantly lower than if the IO was issued in
ascending block order.

Queue new ordered buffers to the tail of the ordered buffer list to
ensure that IO is dispatched in the order it was submitted. This
should significantly improve large sequential write speeds. On a
disk capable of 85MB/s, speeds increase from 50MB/s to 65MB/s for
noop and from 38MB/s to 50MB/s for cfq.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.33-rc6, v2.6.33-rc5, v2.6.33-rc4, v2.6.33-rc3, v2.6.33-rc2, v2.6.33-rc1, v2.6.32, v2.6.32-rc8, v2.6.32-rc7
# 0ab7d13f 06-Nov-2009 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

GFS2: Tag all metadata with jid

There are two spare field in the header common to all GFS2
metadata. One is just the right size to fit a journal id
in it, and this patch updates the journal code so

GFS2: Tag all metadata with jid

There are two spare field in the header common to all GFS2
metadata. One is just the right size to fit a journal id
in it, and this patch updates the journal code so that each
time a metadata block is modified, we tag it with the journal
id of the node which is performing the modification.

The reason for this is that it should make it much easier to
debug issues which arise if we can tell which node was the
last to modify a particular metadata block.

Since the field is updated before the block is written into
the journal, each journal should only contain metadata which
is tagged with its own journal id. The one exception to this
is the journal header block, which might have a different node's
id in it, if that journal was recovered by another node in the
cluster.

Thus each journal will contain a record of which nodes recovered
it, via the journal header.

The other field in the metadata header could potentially be
used to hold information about what kind of operation was
performed, but for the time being we just zero it on each
transaction so that if we use it for that in future, we'll
know that the information (where it exists) is reliable.

I did consider using the other field to hold the journal
sequence number, however since in GFS2's journaling we write
the modified data into the journal and not the original
data, this gives no information as to what action caused the
modification, so I think we can probably come up with a better
use for those 64 bits in the future.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.32-rc6, v2.6.32-rc5, v2.6.32-rc4, v2.6.32-rc3, v2.6.32-rc1, v2.6.32-rc2, v2.6.31, v2.6.31-rc9, v2.6.31-rc8, v2.6.31-rc7, v2.6.31-rc6, v2.6.31-rc5, v2.6.31-rc4, v2.6.31-rc3, v2.6.31-rc2, v2.6.31-rc1
# 63997775 12-Jun-2009 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

GFS2: Add tracepoints

This patch adds the ability to trace various aspects of the GFS2
filesystem. The trace points are divided into three groups,
glocks, logging and bmap. These points have been ch

GFS2: Add tracepoints

This patch adds the ability to trace various aspects of the GFS2
filesystem. The trace points are divided into three groups,
glocks, logging and bmap. These points have been chosen because
they allow inspection of the major internal functions of GFS2
and they are also generic enough that they are unlikely to need
any major changes as the filesystem evolves.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.30, v2.6.30-rc8, v2.6.30-rc7, v2.6.30-rc6, v2.6.30-rc5, v2.6.30-rc4, v2.6.30-rc3, v2.6.30-rc2, v2.6.30-rc1
# c969f58c 07-Apr-2009 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

GFS2: Update the rw flags

After Jens recent updates:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=a1f242524c3c1f5d40f1c9c343427e34d1aadd6e
et al. this is a patch t

GFS2: Update the rw flags

After Jens recent updates:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=a1f242524c3c1f5d40f1c9c343427e34d1aadd6e
et al. this is a patch to bring gfs2 uptodate with the core
code. Also I've managed to squash another call to ll_rw_block()
along the way.

There is still one part of the GFS2 I/O paths which are not correctly
annotated and that is due to the sharing of the writeback code between
the data and metadata address spaces. I would like to change that too,
but this patch is still worth doing on its own, I think.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.29, v2.6.29-rc8, v2.6.29-rc7, v2.6.29-rc6, v2.6.29-rc5, v2.6.29-rc4, v2.6.29-rc3, v2.6.29-rc2
# f057f6cd 12-Jan-2009 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

GFS2: Merge lock_dlm module into GFS2

This is the big patch that I've been working on for some time
now. There are many reasons for wanting to make this change
such as:
o Reducing overhead by elimi

GFS2: Merge lock_dlm module into GFS2

This is the big patch that I've been working on for some time
now. There are many reasons for wanting to make this change
such as:
o Reducing overhead by eliminating duplicated fields between structures
o Simplifcation of the code (reduces the code size by a fair bit)
o The locking interface is now the DLM interface itself as proposed
some time ago.
o Fewer lookups of glocks when processing replies from the DLM
o Fewer memory allocations/deallocations for each glock
o Scope to do further optimisations in the future (but this patch is
more than big enough for now!)

Please note that (a) this patch relates to the lock_dlm module and
not the DLM itself, that is still a separate module; and (b) that
we retain the ability to build GFS2 as a standalone single node
filesystem with out requiring the DLM.

This patch needs a lot of testing, hence my keeping it I restarted
my -git tree after the last merge window. That way, this has the maximum
exposure before its merged. This is (modulo a few minor bug fixes) the
same patch that I've been posting on and off the the last three months
and its passed a number of different tests so far.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.29-rc1, v2.6.28, v2.6.28-rc9, v2.6.28-rc8, v2.6.28-rc7, v2.6.28-rc6, v2.6.28-rc5, v2.6.28-rc4, v2.6.28-rc3, v2.6.28-rc2, v2.6.28-rc1, v2.6.27, v2.6.27-rc9, v2.6.27-rc8, v2.6.27-rc7, v2.6.27-rc6, v2.6.27-rc5, v2.6.27-rc4, v2.6.27-rc3, v2.6.27-rc2, v2.6.27-rc1, v2.6.26, v2.6.26-rc9, v2.6.26-rc8, v2.6.26-rc7, v2.6.26-rc6, v2.6.26-rc5, v2.6.26-rc4, v2.6.26-rc3, v2.6.26-rc2, v2.6.26-rc1, v2.6.25, v2.6.25-rc9, v2.6.25-rc8, v2.6.25-rc7, v2.6.25-rc6, v2.6.25-rc5, v2.6.25-rc4, v2.6.25-rc3, v2.6.25-rc2, v2.6.25-rc1
# 3ad62e87 28-Jan-2008 Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Plug an unlikely leak

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>


# d0109bfa 28-Jan-2008 Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Only do lo_incore_commit once

This patch is performance related. When we're doing a log flush,
I noticed we were calling buf_lo_incore_commit twice: once for
data bufs and once for metadata

[GFS2] Only do lo_incore_commit once

This patch is performance related. When we're doing a log flush,
I noticed we were calling buf_lo_incore_commit twice: once for
data bufs and once for metadata bufs. Since this is the same
function and does the same thing in both cases, there should be
no reason to call it twice. Since we only need to call it once,
we can also make it faster by removing it from the generic "lops"
code and making it a stand-along static function.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.24, v2.6.24-rc8, v2.6.24-rc7, v2.6.24-rc6, v2.6.24-rc5, v2.6.24-rc4, v2.6.24-rc3
# 2bcd610d 08-Nov-2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Don't add glocks to the journal

The only reason for adding glocks to the journal was to keep track
of which locks required a log flush prior to release. We add a
flag to the glock to allow th

[GFS2] Don't add glocks to the journal

The only reason for adding glocks to the journal was to keep track
of which locks required a log flush prior to release. We add a
flag to the glock to allow this check to be made in a simpler way.

This reduces the size of a glock (by 12 bytes on i386, 24 on x86_64)
and means that we can avoid extra work during the journal flush.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.24-rc2, v2.6.24-rc1, v2.6.23, v2.6.23-rc9
# 9ff8ec32 28-Sep-2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Split gfs2_writepage into three cases

This patch splits gfs2_writepage into separate functions for each of
the three cases: writeback, ordered and journalled. As a result
it becomes a lot eas

[GFS2] Split gfs2_writepage into three cases

This patch splits gfs2_writepage into separate functions for each of
the three cases: writeback, ordered and journalled. As a result
it becomes a lot easier to see what each one is doing. The common
code is moved into gfs2_writepage_common.

This fixes a performance bug where we were doing more work than
strictly required in the ordered write case.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.23-rc7
# 16615be1 17-Sep-2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Clean up journaled data writing

This patch cleans up the code for writing journaled data into the log.
It also removes the need to allocate a small "tag" structure for each
block written into

[GFS2] Clean up journaled data writing

This patch cleans up the code for writing journaled data into the log.
It also removes the need to allocate a small "tag" structure for each
block written into the log. Instead we just keep count of the outstanding
I/O so that we can be sure that its all been written at the correct time.
Another result of this patch is that a number of ll_rw_block() calls
have become submit_bh() calls, closing some races at the same time.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.23-rc6
# 1ad38c43 03-Sep-2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Clean up gfs2_trans_add_revoke()

The following alters gfs2_trans_add_revoke() to take a struct
gfs2_bufdata as an argument. This eliminates the memory allocation which
was previously required

[GFS2] Clean up gfs2_trans_add_revoke()

The following alters gfs2_trans_add_revoke() to take a struct
gfs2_bufdata as an argument. This eliminates the memory allocation which
was previously required by making use of the already existing struct
gfs2_bufdata. It makes some sanity checks to ensure that the
gfs2_bufdata has been removed from all the lists before its recycled as
a revoke structure. This saves one memory allocation and one free per
revoke structure.

Also as a result, and to simplify the locking, since there is no longer
any blocking code in gfs2_trans_add_revoke() we must hold the log lock
whenever this function is called. This reduces the amount of times we
take and unlock the log lock.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


# 0820ab51 02-Sep-2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Use slab operations for all gfs2_bufdata allocations

The old revoke structure was allocated using kalloc/kfree but
there is a slab cache for gfs2_bufdata, so we should use that
now that the s

[GFS2] Use slab operations for all gfs2_bufdata allocations

The old revoke structure was allocated using kalloc/kfree but
there is a slab cache for gfs2_bufdata, so we should use that
now that the structures have been converted.

This is part two of the patch series to merge the revoke
and gfs2_bufdata structures.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


# 82e86087 02-Sep-2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Replace revoke structure with bufdata structure

Both the revoke structure and the bufdata structure are quite similar.
They are basically small tags which are put on lists. In addition to
whi

[GFS2] Replace revoke structure with bufdata structure

Both the revoke structure and the bufdata structure are quite similar.
They are basically small tags which are put on lists. In addition to
which the revoke structure is always allocated when there is a bufdata
structure which is (or can be) freed. As such it should be possible to
reduce the number of frees and allocations by using the same structure
for both purposes.

This patch is the first step along that path. It replaces existing uses
of the revoke structure with the bufdata structure.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


# d7b616e2 02-Sep-2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Clean up ordered write code

The following patch removes the ordered write processing from
databuf_lo_before_commit() and moves it to log.c. This has the effect of
greatly simplyfying databuf_

[GFS2] Clean up ordered write code

The following patch removes the ordered write processing from
databuf_lo_before_commit() and moves it to log.c. This has the effect of
greatly simplyfying databuf_lo_before_commit() and well as potentially
making the ordered write code more efficient.

As a side effect of this, its now possible to remove ordered buffers
from the ordered buffer list at any time, so we now make use of this in
invalidatepage and releasepage to ensure timely release of these
buffers.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.23-rc5, v2.6.23-rc4
# 9b9107a5 27-Aug-2007 Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Move pin/unpin into lops.c, clean up locking

gfs2_pin and gfs2_unpin are only used in lops.c, despite being
defined in meta_io.c, so this patch moves them into lops.c and
makes them static. A

[GFS2] Move pin/unpin into lops.c, clean up locking

gfs2_pin and gfs2_unpin are only used in lops.c, despite being
defined in meta_io.c, so this patch moves them into lops.c and
makes them static. At the same time, its possible to clean up
the locking in the buf and databuf _lo_add() functions so that
we only need to grab the spinlock once. Also we have to move
lock_buffer() around the _lo_add() functions since we can't
do that in gfs2_pin() any more since we hold the spinlock
for the duration of that function.

As a result, the code shrinks by 12 lines and we do far fewer
operations when adding buffers to the log. It also makes the
code somewhat easier to read & understand.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


# ec217e0e 22-Aug-2007 Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Patch to protect sd_log_num_jdata

This is a patch to GFS2 to protect sd_log_num_jdata with the
gfs2_log_lock. Without this patch, there is a timing window
where you can get hit the following

[GFS2] Patch to protect sd_log_num_jdata

This is a patch to GFS2 to protect sd_log_num_jdata with the
gfs2_log_lock. Without this patch, there is a timing window
where you can get hit the following assert from function
gfs2_log_flush():

gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp,
sdp->sd_log_num_buf + sdp->sd_log_num_jdata ==
sdp->sd_log_commited_buf +
sdp->sd_log_commited_databuf);

I've tested it on my roth cluster and it fixes the problem.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.23-rc3, v2.6.23-rc2
# 905d2aef 24-Jul-2007 Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Move some code inside the log lock

This is the first of five patches for bug #248176:

There were still some critical variables being manipulated outside
the log_lock spinlock. That usually

[GFS2] Move some code inside the log lock

This is the first of five patches for bug #248176:

There were still some critical variables being manipulated outside
the log_lock spinlock. That usually resulted in a hang.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.23-rc1
# bdcb8856 11-Jul-2007 Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

[GFS2] soft lockup detected in databuf_lo_before_commit

This is part 2 of the patch for bug #245832, part 1 of which is already
in the git tree.

The problem was that sdp->sd_log_num_databuf was not

[GFS2] soft lockup detected in databuf_lo_before_commit

This is part 2 of the patch for bug #245832, part 1 of which is already
in the git tree.

The problem was that sdp->sd_log_num_databuf was not always being
protected by the gfs2_log_lock spinlock, but the sd_log_le_databuf
(which it is supposed to reflect) was protected. That meant there
was a timing window during which gfs2_log_flush called
databuf_lo_before_commit and the count didn't match what was
really on the linked list in that window. So when it ran out of
items on the linked list, it decremented total_dbuf from 0 to -1 and
thus never left the "while(total_dbuf)" loop.

The solution is to protect the variable sdp->sd_log_num_databuf so
that the value will always match the contents of the linked list,
and therefore the number will never go negative, and therefore, the
loop will be exited properly.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.22, v2.6.22-rc7, v2.6.22-rc6
# 773ed1a0 20-Jun-2007 Robert Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Addendum to the journaled file/unmount patch

This patch is an addendum to the previous journaled file/unmount patch.
It fixes a problem discovered during testing.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson

[GFS2] Addendum to the journaled file/unmount patch

This patch is an addendum to the previous journaled file/unmount patch.
It fixes a problem discovered during testing.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


# 2332c443 18-Jun-2007 Robert Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

[GFS2] assertion failure after writing to journaled file, umount

This patch passes all my nasty tests that were causing the code to
fail under one circumstance or another. Here is a complete summar

[GFS2] assertion failure after writing to journaled file, umount

This patch passes all my nasty tests that were causing the code to
fail under one circumstance or another. Here is a complete summary
of all changes from today's git tree, in order of appearance:

1. There are now separate variables for metadata buffer accounting.
2. Variable sd_log_num_hdrs is no longer needed, since the header
accounting is taken care of by the reserve/refund sequence.
3. Fixed a tiny grammatical problem in a comment.
4. Added a new function "calc_reserved" to calculate the reserved
log space. This isn't entirely necessary, but it has two benefits:
First, it simplifies the gfs2_log_refund function greatly.
Second, it allows for easier debugging because I could sprinkle the
code with calls to this function to make sure the accounting is
proper (by adding asserts and printks) at strategic point of the code.
5. In log_pull_tail there apparently was a kludge to fix up the
accounting based on a "pull" parameter. The buffer accounting is
now done properly, so the kludge was removed.
6. File sync operations were making a call to gfs2_log_flush that
writes another journal header. Since that header was unplanned
for (reserved) by the reserve/refund sequence, the free space had
to be decremented so that when log_pull_tail gets called, the free
space is be adjusted properly. (Did I hear you call that a kludge?
well, maybe, but a lot more justifiable than the one I removed).
7. In the gfs2_log_shutdown code, it optionally syncs the log by
specifying the PULL parameter to log_write_header. I'm not sure
this is necessary anymore. It just seems to me there could be
cases where shutdown is called while there are outstanding log
buffers.
8. In the (data)buf_lo_before_commit functions, I changed some offset
values from being calculated on the fly to being constants. That
simplified some code and we might as well let the compiler do the
calculation once rather than redoing those cycles at run time.
9. This version has my rewritten databuf_lo_add function.
This version is much more like its predecessor, buf_lo_add, which
makes it easier to understand. Again, this might not be necessary,
but it seems as if this one works as well as the previous one,
maybe even better, so I decided to leave it in.
10. In databuf_lo_before_commit, a previous data corruption problem
was caused by going off the end of the buffer. The proper solution
is to have the proper limit in place, rather than stopping earlier.
(Thus my previous attempt to fix it is wrong).
If you don't wrap the buffer, you're stopping too early and that
causes more log buffer accounting problems.
11. In lops.h there are two new (previously mentioned) constants for
figuring out the data offset for the journal buffers.
12. There are also two new functions, buf_limit and databuf_limit to
calculate how many entries will fit in the buffer.
13. In function gfs2_meta_wipe, it needs to distinguish between pinned
metadata buffers and journaled data buffers for proper journal buffer
accounting. It can't use the JDATA gfs2_inode flag because it's
sometimes passed the "real" inode and sometimes the "metadata
inode" and the inode flags will be random bits in a metadata
gfs2_inode. It needs to base its decision on which was passed in.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.22-rc5
# 8fb68595 12-Jun-2007 Robert Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>

[GFS2] Journaled file write/unstuff bug

This patch is for bugzilla bug 283162, which uncovered a number of
bugs pertaining to writing to files that have the journaled bit on.
These bugs happen most

[GFS2] Journaled file write/unstuff bug

This patch is for bugzilla bug 283162, which uncovered a number of
bugs pertaining to writing to files that have the journaled bit on.
These bugs happen most often when writing to the meta_fs because
the files are always journaled. So operations like gfs2_grow were
particularly vulnerable, although many of the problems could be
recreated with normal files after setting the journaled bit on.
The problems fixed are:

-GFS2 wasn't ever writing unstuffed journaled data blocks to their
in-place location on disk. Now it does.

-If you unmounted too quickly after doing IO to a journaled file,
GFS2 was crashing because you would discard a buffer whose bufdata
was still on the active items list. GFS2 now deals with this
gracefully.

-GFS2 was losing track of the bufdata for journaled data blocks,
and it wasn't getting freed, causing an error when you tried to
unmount the module. GFS2 now frees all the bufdata structures.

-There was a memory corruption occurring because GFS2 wrote
twice as many log entries for journaled buffers.

-It was occasionally trying to write journal headers in buffers
that weren't currently mapped.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

show more ...


12345678910>>...13