History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c (Results 76 – 100 of 319)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v3.16-rc1, v3.15, v3.15-rc8, v3.15-rc7, v3.15-rc6, v3.15-rc5, v3.15-rc4, v3.15-rc3, v3.15-rc2, v3.15-rc1, v3.14, v3.14-rc8, v3.14-rc7, v3.14-rc6, v3.14-rc5
# 176840b3 25-Feb-2014 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>

Btrfs: more efficient btrfs_drop_extent_cache

While droping extent map structures from the extent cache that cover our
target range, we would remove each extent map structure from the red black
tree

Btrfs: more efficient btrfs_drop_extent_cache

While droping extent map structures from the extent cache that cover our
target range, we would remove each extent map structure from the red black
tree and then add either 1 or 2 new extent map structures if the former
extent map covered sections outside our target range.

This change simply attempts to replace the existing extent map structure
with a new one that covers the subsection we're not interested in, instead
of doing a red black remove operation followed by an insertion operation.

The number of elements in an inode's extent map tree can get very high for large
files under random writes. For example, while running the following test:

sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=1 --file-total-size=10G \
--file-test-mode=rndrw --num-threads=32 --file-block-size=32768 \
--max-requests=500000 --file-rw-ratio=2 [prepare|run]

I captured the following histogram capturing the number of extent_map items
in the red black tree while that test was running:

Count: 122462
Range: 1.000 - 172231.000; Mean: 96415.831; Median: 101855.000; Stddev: 49700.981
Percentiles: 90th: 160120.000; 95th: 166335.000; 99th: 171070.000
1.000 - 5.231: 452 |
5.231 - 187.392: 87 |
187.392 - 585.911: 206 |
585.911 - 1827.438: 623 |
1827.438 - 5695.245: 1962 #
5695.245 - 17744.861: 6204 ####
17744.861 - 55283.764: 21115 ############
55283.764 - 172231.000: 91813 #####################################################

Benchmark:

sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=1 --file-total-size=10G --file-test-mode=rndwr \
--num-threads=64 --file-block-size=32768 --max-requests=0 --max-time=60 \
--file-io-mode=sync --file-fsync-freq=0 [prepare|run]

Before this change: 122.1Mb/sec
After this change: 125.07Mb/sec
(averages of 5 test runs)

Test machine: quad core intel i5-3570K, 32Gb of ram, SSD

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

show more ...


# cbc0e928 25-Feb-2014 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>

Btrfs: remove unneeded field / smaller extent_map structure

We don't need to have an unsigned int field in the extent_map struct
to tell us whether the extent map is in the inode's extent_map tree o

Btrfs: remove unneeded field / smaller extent_map structure

We don't need to have an unsigned int field in the extent_map struct
to tell us whether the extent map is in the inode's extent_map tree or
not. We can use the rb_node struct field and the RB_CLEAR_NODE and
RB_EMPTY_NODE macros to achieve the same task.

This reduces sizeof(struct extent_map) from 152 bytes to 144 bytes (on a
64 bits system).

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.14-rc4, v3.14-rc3, v3.14-rc2, v3.14-rc1, v3.13, v3.13-rc8, v3.13-rc7, v3.13-rc6, v3.13-rc5, v3.13-rc4, v3.13-rc3
# d527afe1 30-Nov-2013 Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>

Btrfs: fix extent_map block_len after merging

When merging an extent_map with its right neighbor, increment
its block_len with the neighbor's block_len.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fd

Btrfs: fix extent_map block_len after merging

When merging an extent_map with its right neighbor, increment
its block_len with the neighbor's block_len.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.13-rc2
# 32193c14 24-Nov-2013 Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>

Btrfs: faster and more efficient extent map insertion

Before this change, adding an extent map to the extent map tree of an
inode required 2 tree nevigations:

1) doing a tree navigation to search f

Btrfs: faster and more efficient extent map insertion

Before this change, adding an extent map to the extent map tree of an
inode required 2 tree nevigations:

1) doing a tree navigation to search for an existing extent map starting
at the same offset or an extent map that overlaps the extent map we
want to insert;

2) Another tree navigation to add the extent map to the tree (if the
former tree search didn't found anything).

This change just merges these 2 steps into a single one.
While running first few btrfs xfstests I had noticed these trees easily
had a few hundred elements, and then with the following sysbench test it
reached over 1100 elements very often.

Test:

sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=32 --file-total-size=10G \
--file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \
--max-requests=1000000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run]

(fs created with mkfs.btrfs -l 4096 -f /dev/sdb3 before each sysbench
prepare phase)

Before this patch:

run 1 - 41.894Mb/sec
run 2 - 40.527Mb/sec
run 3 - 40.922Mb/sec
run 4 - 49.433Mb/sec
run 5 - 40.959Mb/sec

average - 42.75Mb/sec

After this patch:

run 1 - 48.036Mb/sec
run 2 - 50.21Mb/sec
run 3 - 50.929Mb/sec
run 4 - 46.881Mb/sec
run 5 - 53.192Mb/sec

average - 49.85Mb/sec

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.13-rc1, v3.12, v3.12-rc7, v3.12-rc6, v3.12-rc5, v3.12-rc4, v3.12-rc3, v3.12-rc2, v3.12-rc1, v3.11, v3.11-rc7, v3.11-rc6, v3.11-rc5, v3.11-rc4, v3.11-rc3, v3.11-rc2, v3.11-rc1, v3.10, v3.10-rc7, v3.10-rc6, v3.10-rc5, v3.10-rc4, v3.10-rc3, v3.10-rc2, v3.10-rc1, v3.9
# 48a3b636 25-Apr-2013 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>

btrfs: make static code static & remove dead code

Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which
are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout.

removed functions:

btrfs: make static code static & remove dead code

Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which
are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout.

removed functions:

btrfs_iref_to_path()
__btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item()
__btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item()
__btrfs_search_delayed_deletion_item()
find_eb_for_page()
btrfs_find_block_group()
range_straddles_pages()
extent_range_uptodate()
btrfs_file_extent_length()
btrfs_scrub_cancel_devid()
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush()

btrfs_print_tree() is left because it is used for debugging.
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() and btrfs_reada_detach() are
left for symmetry.

ulist.c functions are left, another patch will take care of those.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.9-rc8, v3.9-rc7, v3.9-rc6
# 09a2a8f9 05-Apr-2013 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs: fix bad extent logging

A user sent me a btrfs-image of a file system that was panicing on mount during
the log recovery. I had originally thought these problems were from a bug in
the free s

Btrfs: fix bad extent logging

A user sent me a btrfs-image of a file system that was panicing on mount during
the log recovery. I had originally thought these problems were from a bug in
the free space cache code, but that was just a symptom of the problem. The
problem is if your application does something like this

[prealloc][prealloc][prealloc]

the internal extent maps will merge those all together into one extent map, even
though on disk they are 3 separate extents. So if you go to write into one of
these ranges the extent map will be right since we use the physical extent when
doing the write, but when we log the extents they will use the wrong sizes for
the remainder prealloc space. If this doesn't happen to trip up the free space
cache (which it won't in a lot of cases) then you will get bogus entries in your
extent tree which will screw stuff up later. The data and such will still work,
but everything else is broken. This patch fixes this by not allowing extents
that are on the modified list to be merged. This has the side effect that we
are no longer adding everything to the modified list all the time, which means
we now have to call btrfs_drop_extents every time we log an extent into the
tree. So this allows me to drop all this speciality code I was using to get
around calling btrfs_drop_extents. With this patch the testcase I've created no
longer creates a bogus file system after replaying the log. Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.9-rc5, v3.9-rc4, v3.9-rc3, v3.9-rc2, v3.9-rc1, v3.8
# 180e001c 14-Feb-2013 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

btrfs: fixup/remove module.h usage as required

We want to avoid module.h where posible, since it in turn includes
nearly all of header space. This means removing it where it is not
required, and us

btrfs: fixup/remove module.h usage as required

We want to avoid module.h where posible, since it in turn includes
nearly all of header space. This means removing it where it is not
required, and using export.h where we are only exporting symbols via
EXPORT_SYMBOL and friends.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.8-rc7, v3.8-rc6
# 222c81dc 28-Jan-2013 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs: do not merge logged extents if we've removed them from the tree

You can run into this problem where if somebody is fsyncing and writing out
the existing extents you will have removed the exte

Btrfs: do not merge logged extents if we've removed them from the tree

You can run into this problem where if somebody is fsyncing and writing out
the existing extents you will have removed the extent map from the em tree,
but it's still valid for the current fsync so we go ahead and write it. The
problem is we unconditionally try to merge it back into the em tree, but if
we've removed it from the em tree that will cause use after free problems.
Fix this to only merge if we are still a part of the tree. Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.8-rc5
# 201a9038 24-Jan-2013 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs: do not allow logged extents to be merged or removed

We drop the extent map tree lock while we're logging extents, so somebody
could come in and merge another extent into this one and screw up

Btrfs: do not allow logged extents to be merged or removed

We drop the extent map tree lock while we're logging extents, so somebody
could come in and merge another extent into this one and screw up our
logging, or they could even remove us from the list which would keep us from
logging the extent or freeing our ref on it, so we need to make sure to not
clear LOGGING until after the extent is logged, and then we can merge it to
adjacent extents. Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.8-rc4, v3.8-rc3, v3.8-rc2, v3.8-rc1, v3.7, v3.7-rc8, v3.7-rc7, v3.7-rc6, v3.7-rc5, v3.7-rc4, v3.7-rc3, v3.7-rc2, v3.7-rc1
# 70c8a91c 11-Oct-2012 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs: log changed inodes based on the extent map tree

We don't really need to copy extents from the source tree since we have all
of the information already available to us in the extent_map tree.

Btrfs: log changed inodes based on the extent map tree

We don't really need to copy extents from the source tree since we have all
of the information already available to us in the extent_map tree. So
instead just write the extents straight to the log tree and don't bother to
copy the extent items from the source tree.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

show more ...


# b11e234d 03-Dec-2012 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs: do not mark ems as prealloc if we are writing to them

We are going to use EM's to log extents in the future, so we need to not
mark them as prealloc if they aren't actually prealloc extents.

Btrfs: do not mark ems as prealloc if we are writing to them

We are going to use EM's to log extents in the future, so we need to not
mark them as prealloc if they aren't actually prealloc extents. Instead
mark them with FILLING so we know to ammend mod_start/mod_len and that way
we don't confuse the extent logging code. Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

show more ...


# 52b1de91 30-Oct-2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>

btrfs: unpin_extent_cache: fix the typo and unnecessary arguements

- unpint->unpin
- prealloc is no more used

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.c

btrfs: unpin_extent_cache: fix the typo and unnecessary arguements

- unpint->unpin
- prealloc is no more used

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.6, v3.6-rc7, v3.6-rc6
# ff44c6e3 14-Sep-2012 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs: do not hold the write_lock on the extent tree while logging

Dave Sterba pointed out a sleeping while atomic bug while doing fsync. This
is because I'm an idiot and didn't realize that rwlock

Btrfs: do not hold the write_lock on the extent tree while logging

Dave Sterba pointed out a sleeping while atomic bug while doing fsync. This
is because I'm an idiot and didn't realize that rwlock's were spin locks, so
we've been holding this thing while doing allocations and such which is not
good. This patch fixes this by dropping the write lock before we do
anything heavy and re-acquire it when it is done. We also need to take a
ref on the em's in case their corresponding pages are evicted and mark them
as being logged so that releasepage does not remove them and doesn't remove
them from our local list. Thanks,

Reported-by: Dave Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.6-rc5
# 837e1972 07-Sep-2012 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>

btrfs: polish names of kmem caches

Usecase:

watch 'grep btrfs < /proc/slabinfo'

easy to watch all caches in one go.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>


Revision tags: v3.6-rc4
# 4e2f84e6 27-Aug-2012 Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>

Btrfs: improve fsync by filtering extents that we want

This is based on Josef's "Btrfs: turbo charge fsync".

The above Josef's patch performs very good in random sync write test,
because we won't h

Btrfs: improve fsync by filtering extents that we want

This is based on Josef's "Btrfs: turbo charge fsync".

The above Josef's patch performs very good in random sync write test,
because we won't have too much extents to merge.

However, it does not performs good on the test:
dd if=/dev/zero of=foobar bs=4k count=12500 oflag=sync

The reason is when we do sequencial sync write, we need to merge the
current extent just with the previous one, so that we can get accumulated
extents to log:

A(4k) --> AA(8k) --> AAA(12k) --> AAAA(16k) ...

So we'll have to flush more and more checksum into log tree, which is the
bottleneck according to my tests.

But we can avoid this by telling fsync the real extents that are needed
to be logged.

With this, I did the above dd sync write test (size=50m),

w/o (orig) w/ (josef's) w/ (this)
SATA 104KB/s 109KB/s 121KB/s
ramdisk 1.5MB/s 1.5MB/s 10.7MB/s (613%)

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.6-rc3
# 5dc562c5 17-Aug-2012 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Btrfs: turbo charge fsync

At least for the vm workload. Currently on fsync we will

1) Truncate all items in the log tree for the given inode if they exist

and

2) Copy all items for a given inode

Btrfs: turbo charge fsync

At least for the vm workload. Currently on fsync we will

1) Truncate all items in the log tree for the given inode if they exist

and

2) Copy all items for a given inode into the log

The problem with this is that for things like VMs you can have lots of
extents from the fragmented writing behavior, and worst yet you may have
only modified a few extents, not the entire thing. This patch fixes this
problem by tracking which transid modified our extent, and then when we do
the tree logging we find all of the extents we've modified in our current
transaction, sort them and commit them. We also only truncate up to the
xattrs of the inode and copy that stuff in normally, and then just drop any
extents in the range we have that exist in the log already. Here are some
numbers of a 50 meg fio job that does random writes and fsync()s after every
write

Original Patched
SATA drive 82KB/s 140KB/s
Fusion drive 431KB/s 2532KB/s

So around 2-6 times faster depending on your hardware. There are a few
corner cases, for example if you truncate at all we have to do it the old
way since there is no way to be sure what is in the log is ok. This
probably could be done smarter, but if you write-fsync-truncate-write-fsync
you deserve what you get. All this work is in RAM of course so if your
inode gets evicted from cache and you read it in and fsync it we'll do it
the slow way if we are still in the same transaction that we last modified
the inode in.

The biggest cool part of this is that it requires no changes to the recovery
code, so if you fsync with this patch and crash and load an old kernel, it
will run the recovery and be a-ok. I have tested this pretty thoroughly
with an fsync tester and everything comes back fine, as well as xfstests.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.6-rc2, v3.6-rc1, v3.5, v3.5-rc7, v3.5-rc6, v3.5-rc5, v3.5-rc4, v3.5-rc3, v3.5-rc2, v3.5-rc1, v3.4, v3.4-rc7, v3.4-rc6, v3.4-rc5, v3.4-rc4, v3.4-rc3, v3.4-rc2, v3.4-rc1, v3.3, v3.3-rc7, v3.3-rc6, v3.3-rc5, v3.3-rc4, v3.3-rc3, v3.3-rc2, v3.3-rc1, v3.2, v3.2-rc7, v3.2-rc6, v3.2-rc5, v3.2-rc4, v3.2-rc3, v3.2-rc2, v3.2-rc1, v3.1, v3.1-rc10, v3.1-rc9, v3.1-rc8, v3.1-rc7, v3.1-rc6, v3.1-rc5, v3.1-rc4, v3.1-rc3, v3.1-rc2, v3.1-rc1, v3.0
# 4d2c8f62 13-Jul-2011 Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>

Btrfs: clean up code for merging extent maps

unpin_extent_cache() and add_extent_mapping() shares the same code
that merges extent maps.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by:

Btrfs: clean up code for merging extent maps

unpin_extent_cache() and add_extent_mapping() shares the same code
that merges extent maps.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

show more ...


# ed64f066 13-Jul-2011 Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>

Btrfs: clean up code for extent_map lookup

lookup_extent_map() and search_extent_map() can share most of code.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@

Btrfs: clean up code for extent_map lookup

lookup_extent_map() and search_extent_map() can share most of code.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

show more ...


# 7e016a03 13-Jul-2011 Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>

Btrfs: clean up search_extent_mapping()

rb_node returned by __tree_search() can be a valid pointer or NULL,
but won't be some errno.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chr

Btrfs: clean up search_extent_mapping()

rb_node returned by __tree_search() can be a valid pointer or NULL,
but won't be some errno.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.0-rc7, v3.0-rc6, v3.0-rc5, v3.0-rc4, v3.0-rc3, v3.0-rc2, v3.0-rc1, v2.6.39, v2.6.39-rc7, v2.6.39-rc6, v2.6.39-rc5
# 172ddd60 20-Apr-2011 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>

btrfs: drop gfp parameter from alloc_extent_map

pass GFP_NOFS directly to kmem_cache_alloc

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>


# a8067e02 20-Apr-2011 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>

btrfs: drop unused parameter from extent_map_tree_init

the GFP flags are not stored anywhere and all allocations are done via
alloc_extent_map(GFP_NOFS).

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.c

btrfs: drop unused parameter from extent_map_tree_init

the GFP flags are not stored anywhere and all allocations are done via
alloc_extent_map(GFP_NOFS).

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.39-rc4, v2.6.39-rc3, v2.6.39-rc2
# 25985edc 30-Mar-2011 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>

Fix common misspellings

Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>


Revision tags: v2.6.39-rc1, v2.6.38, v2.6.38-rc8, v2.6.38-rc7, v2.6.38-rc6, v2.6.38-rc5
# c26a9203 13-Feb-2011 Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>

Btrfs: check return value of alloc_extent_map()

I add the check on the return value of alloc_extent_map() to several places.
In addition, alloc_extent_map() returns only the address or NULL.
Therefo

Btrfs: check return value of alloc_extent_map()

I add the check on the return value of alloc_extent_map() to several places.
In addition, alloc_extent_map() returns only the address or NULL.
Therefore, check by IS_ERR() is unnecessary. So, I remove IS_ERR() checking.

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.38-rc4, v2.6.38-rc3, v2.6.38-rc2, v2.6.38-rc1, v2.6.37, v2.6.37-rc8, v2.6.37-rc7
# 261507a0 17-Dec-2010 Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>

btrfs: Allow to add new compression algorithm

Make the code aware of compression type, instead of always assuming
zlib compression.

Also make the zlib workspace function as common code for all
comp

btrfs: Allow to add new compression algorithm

Make the code aware of compression type, instead of always assuming
zlib compression.

Also make the zlib workspace function as common code for all
compression types.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.37-rc6, v2.6.37-rc5, v2.6.37-rc4, v2.6.37-rc3, v2.6.37-rc2, v2.6.37-rc1
# d0b678cb 29-Oct-2010 Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>

Btrfs: Use ERR_CAST helpers

Use ERR_CAST(x) rather than ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(x)). The former makes more
clear what is the purpose of the operation, which otherwise looks like a
no-op.

The semantic patc

Btrfs: Use ERR_CAST helpers

Use ERR_CAST(x) rather than ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(x)). The former makes more
clear what is the purpose of the operation, which otherwise looks like a
no-op.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
type T;
T x;
identifier f;
@@

T f (...) { <+...
- ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(x))
+ x
...+> }

@@
expression x;
@@

- ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(x))
+ ERR_CAST(x)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

show more ...


12345678910>>...13