iwlwifi: pcie: add ISR debug info for msix debug

The debug prints help in case we get timeout on waiting for
hw.

Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu

iwlwifi: pcie: add ISR debug info for msix debug

The debug prints help in case we get timeout on waiting for
hw.

Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210411124417.306e2e56d3e8.I72e2977abbb1fddf23b8476bedf6a183fe969ff5@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: remove flags argument for nic_access

Since we no longer save interrupts, we no longer need the flags
argument here, remove it throughout.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.

iwlwifi: remove flags argument for nic_access

Since we no longer save interrupts, we no longer need the flags
argument here, remove it throughout.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210142629.8de8fe6f9fff.If040b056d0e8c771c65ac5c29230f939354a142b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: dbg: add op_mode callback for collecting debug data.

The first use is collecting debug data when transport stops the device.

Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.c

iwlwifi: dbg: add op_mode callback for collecting debug data.

The first use is collecting debug data when transport stops the device.

Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210142629.d282d0a9ee7b.I9a0ad29f80daba8956a6aa077ba865e19b2150be@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: NULLify pointers after free

Remember that those pointers have been freed by setting them
to NULL. Otherwise, we'd keep rxq pointing to random memory
which would prevent us from trying

iwlwifi: pcie: NULLify pointers after free

Remember that those pointers have been freed by setting them
to NULL. Otherwise, we'd keep rxq pointing to random memory
which would prevent us from trying to re-allocate the Rx
resources if we call rx_alloc again.

Also, propagate the allocation failure to the caller of
iwl_pcie_nic_init so that we won't go further in the
start flow.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210135352.996b400d2f1c.I630379c504644700322f57b259383ae0af8d1975@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: don't disable interrupts for reg_lock

The only thing we do touching the device in hard interrupt context
is, at most, writing an interrupt ACK register, which isn't racing
in with any

iwlwifi: pcie: don't disable interrupts for reg_lock

The only thing we do touching the device in hard interrupt context
is, at most, writing an interrupt ACK register, which isn't racing
in with anything protected by the reg_lock.

Thus, avoid disabling interrupts here for potentially long periods
of time, particularly long periods have been observed with dumping
of firmware memory (leading to lockup warnings on some devices.)

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210135352.da916ab91298.I064c3e7823b616647293ed97da98edefb9ce9435@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: tx: move handing sync/async host command to trans

Handling host commands in a sync way is not directly related to PCIe
transport, and can serve as common logic for any transport, so move
it

iwlwifi: tx: move handing sync/async host command to trans

Handling host commands in a sync way is not directly related to PCIe
transport, and can serve as common logic for any transport, so move
it to trans layer.

Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.fde99af4e0f7.I4cab95919eb35cc5bfb26d32dcf5e15419d0e0ef@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: remove TRANS_PM_OPS

Those were needed for a slave bus that is not longer supported.
Remove code that is mainly useless stubs.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

iwlwifi: remove TRANS_PM_OPS

Those were needed for a slave bus that is not longer supported.
Remove code that is mainly useless stubs.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.8f8a735f39dd.If5716eaae0df5e6295a2af927bf3ab0ee074f0a0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwl-trans: iwlwifi: move sync NMI logic to trans

The code is not directly related to PCIe transport, and it will help
moving sync/async commands logic out of PCIe in the next patches.

Signed-off-by

iwl-trans: iwlwifi: move sync NMI logic to trans

The code is not directly related to PCIe transport, and it will help
moving sync/async commands logic out of PCIe in the next patches.

Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.271f59887fd1.I8ff41236f4e11a25df83d76c982a2a30ba2b9903@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: properly implement NAPI

Instead of pretending to have NAPI and then relying entirely on
interrupts anyway, properly implement NAPI and schedule the poll
when we get an interrupt, re-e

iwlwifi: pcie: properly implement NAPI

Instead of pretending to have NAPI and then relying entirely on
interrupts anyway, properly implement NAPI and schedule the poll
when we get an interrupt, re-enabling the interrupt only after
the poll completed.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.a5951ac4fc06.I9c84a147288fcfb1b019572c6758f2d92949f5d7@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: reschedule in long-running memory reads

If we spin for a long time in memory reads that (for some reason in
hardware) take a long time, then we'll eventually get messages such
as

w

iwlwifi: pcie: reschedule in long-running memory reads

If we spin for a long time in memory reads that (for some reason in
hardware) take a long time, then we'll eventually get messages such
as

watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 24s! [kworker/2:2:272]

This is because the reading really does take a very long time, and
we don't schedule, so we're hogging the CPU with this task, at least
if CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set, e.g. with CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y.

Previously I misinterpreted the situation and thought that this was
only going to happen if we had interrupts disabled, and then fixed
this (which is good anyway, however), but that didn't always help;
looking at it again now I realized that the spin unlock will only
reschedule if CONFIG_PREEMPT is used.

In order to avoid this issue, change the code to cond_resched() if
we've been spinning for too long here.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fixes: 04516706bb99 ("iwlwifi: pcie: limit memory read spin time")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210115130253.217a9d6a6a12.If964cb582ab0aaa94e81c4ff3b279eaafda0fd3f@changeid

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: use jiffies for memory read spin time limit

There's no reason to use ktime_get() since we don't need any better
precision than jiffies, and since we no longer disable interrupts
aroun

iwlwifi: pcie: use jiffies for memory read spin time limit

There's no reason to use ktime_get() since we don't need any better
precision than jiffies, and since we no longer disable interrupts
around this code (when grabbing NIC access), jiffies will work fine.
Use jiffies instead of ktime_get().

This cleanup is preparation for the following patch "iwlwifi: pcie: reschedule
in long-running memory reads". The code gets simpler with the weird clock use
etc. removed before we add cond_resched().

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210115130253.621c948b1fad.I3ee9f4bc4e74a0c9125d42fb7c35cd80df4698a1@changeid

show more ...

iwlwifi: support firmware reset handshake

There are some races in the hardware that can possibly lead to
a bus lockup later during a restart when we manage to kill the
firmware at a bad time (while

iwlwifi: support firmware reset handshake

There are some races in the hardware that can possibly lead to
a bus lockup later during a restart when we manage to kill the
firmware at a bad time (while it's accessing the bus).

To work around this, add support for a new handshake between
firmware and driver to ensure that the firmware is in a well-
known state before we kill it.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.7756fcc9865c.I13de65e0ffcb4186dd4c1a465f66df2e98c9a947@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: use SPDX tags

Use SPDX tags instead of the long copyright notices. Also cleanup
some duplicate copyright notices and combine the years where possible.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johann

iwlwifi: use SPDX tags

Use SPDX tags instead of the long copyright notices. Also cleanup
some duplicate copyright notices and combine the years where possible.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201210000603.481bcb512a6f.I8146abe5a637079e7336209f23cb26af98b12b31@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: remove unnecessary setting of inta_mask

We set this here, but don't really use it until we've
enabled interrupts. But when enabling interrupts we
always overwrite this value anyway, s

iwlwifi: pcie: remove unnecessary setting of inta_mask

We set this here, but don't really use it until we've
enabled interrupts. But when enabling interrupts we
always overwrite this value anyway, so remove setting
it here, mostly in order not to have some additional
code duplicated later.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.135d96297aca.Id2d26fff60b6c31202bb0a36e46948bda6a39d33@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: remove MSIX_HW_INT_CAUSES_REG_IML handling

This is actually wrong, the bit used here by the image loader
is BIT(1), not BIT(2). The latter will be reused by the new
reset flow soon.

iwlwifi: pcie: remove MSIX_HW_INT_CAUSES_REG_IML handling

This is actually wrong, the bit used here by the image loader
is BIT(1), not BIT(2). The latter will be reused by the new
reset flow soon.

However, as we never had any complaints about not printing
the IML status or not handling the IML error interrupt (and
I suspect the code handling it was incorrectly anyway) just
remove the code for it.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.9a323f4a3493.Ic7aee4dbbf4be42287c338c2fa1b111473724116@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: remove sw_csum_tx

This was a hack done to test the data path of devices that
didn't support well CSUM offload in Tx. This is not needed
anymore.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.

iwlwifi: remove sw_csum_tx

This was a hack done to test the data path of devices that
didn't support well CSUM offload in Tx. This is not needed
anymore.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.6c9fc9fb48d5.I2aaebf90e6fe81860105d049a8d35746fa8d86c2@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: remove obsolete pre-release support code

We no longer need code that was introduced to differentiate
between two early versions of 8260.

We can remove this convoluted way to get the

iwlwifi: pcie: remove obsolete pre-release support code

We no longer need code that was introduced to differentiate
between two early versions of 8260.

We can remove this convoluted way to get the hardware version
that was needed because of a bug in the register's
configuration.

Moreover, since we no longer need to access the PRPH
registers, we no longer need to wake up the device,
request ownership, etc...
Remove all that.

This allows us to get the rid of the obsolete comment
about the AUX bus MISC address space which should have
been moved when this code was moved away from here.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.4a5665ccd8a6.Iff3879405c15758ba661c430e77dc2160ddada1c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: move reclaim flows to the queue file

Reclaim flows are bus-independent TX functions so we move
it to the common place handling bus-independent tx operations

used spatch rule

@@
@@
(
-iwl_

iwlwifi: move reclaim flows to the queue file

Reclaim flows are bus-independent TX functions so we move
it to the common place handling bus-independent tx operations

used spatch rule

@@
@@
(
-iwl_trans_pcie_freeze_txq_timer
+iwl_trans_txq_freeze_timer
|
-iwl_trans_pcie_set_q_ptrs
+iwl_trans_txq_set_q_ptrs
|
-iwl_pcie_txq_free_tfd
+iwl_txq_free_tfd
|
-iwl_pcie_txq_progress
+iwl_txq_progress
|
-iwl_trans_pcie_reclaim
+iwl_trans_txq_reclaim
)

Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.40723e92b6bf.I83cf71d9c6d989ec42f52b353f1d33f32540db59@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: yoyo: align the write pointer to DWs

from AX210 generation the write pointer is in Bytes.
to be align with all previous HWs convert it DWs.

Signed-off-by: Rotem Saado <rotem.saado@intel.co

iwlwifi: yoyo: align the write pointer to DWs

from AX210 generation the write pointer is in Bytes.
to be align with all previous HWs convert it DWs.

Signed-off-by: Rotem Saado <rotem.saado@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231351.c9a9cbef4a09.Ic7df63c617f79b7e6a95a510c51b3516bba5599f@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: free RBs during configure

[ Upstream commit 6ac5720086c8b176794eb74c5cc09f8b79017f38 ]

When switching op-modes, or more generally when reconfiguring,
we might switch the RB size. In

iwlwifi: pcie: free RBs during configure

[ Upstream commit 6ac5720086c8b176794eb74c5cc09f8b79017f38 ]

When switching op-modes, or more generally when reconfiguring,
we might switch the RB size. In _iwl_pcie_rx_init() we have a
comment saying we must free all RBs since we might switch the
size, but this is actually too late: the switch has been done
and we'll free the buffers with the wrong size.

Fix this by always freeing the buffers, if any, at the start
of configure, instead of only after the size may have changed.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210802170640.42d7c93279c4.I07f74e65aab0e3d965a81206fcb289dc92d74878@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: don't disable interrupts for reg_lock

[ Upstream commit 874020f8adce535cd318af1768ffe744251b6593 ]

The only thing we do touching the device in hard interrupt context
is, at most, wri

iwlwifi: pcie: don't disable interrupts for reg_lock

[ Upstream commit 874020f8adce535cd318af1768ffe744251b6593 ]

The only thing we do touching the device in hard interrupt context
is, at most, writing an interrupt ACK register, which isn't racing
in with anything protected by the reg_lock.

Thus, avoid disabling interrupts here for potentially long periods
of time, particularly long periods have been observed with dumping
of firmware memory (leading to lockup warnings on some devices.)

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210135352.da916ab91298.I064c3e7823b616647293ed97da98edefb9ce9435@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: reschedule in long-running memory reads

[ Upstream commit 3d372c4edfd4dffb7dea71c6b096fb414782b776 ]

If we spin for a long time in memory reads that (for some reason in
hardware) tak

iwlwifi: pcie: reschedule in long-running memory reads

[ Upstream commit 3d372c4edfd4dffb7dea71c6b096fb414782b776 ]

If we spin for a long time in memory reads that (for some reason in
hardware) take a long time, then we'll eventually get messages such
as

watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 24s! [kworker/2:2:272]

This is because the reading really does take a very long time, and
we don't schedule, so we're hogging the CPU with this task, at least
if CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set, e.g. with CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y.

Previously I misinterpreted the situation and thought that this was
only going to happen if we had interrupts disabled, and then fixed
this (which is good anyway, however), but that didn't always help;
looking at it again now I realized that the spin unlock will only
reschedule if CONFIG_PREEMPT is used.

In order to avoid this issue, change the code to cond_resched() if
we've been spinning for too long here.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fixes: 04516706bb99 ("iwlwifi: pcie: limit memory read spin time")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210115130253.217a9d6a6a12.If964cb582ab0aaa94e81c4ff3b279eaafda0fd3f@changeid
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: use jiffies for memory read spin time limit

[ Upstream commit 6701317476bbfb1f341aa935ddf75eb73af784f9 ]

There's no reason to use ktime_get() since we don't need any better
precision

iwlwifi: pcie: use jiffies for memory read spin time limit

[ Upstream commit 6701317476bbfb1f341aa935ddf75eb73af784f9 ]

There's no reason to use ktime_get() since we don't need any better
precision than jiffies, and since we no longer disable interrupts
around this code (when grabbing NIC access), jiffies will work fine.
Use jiffies instead of ktime_get().

This cleanup is preparation for the following patch "iwlwifi: pcie: reschedule
in long-running memory reads". The code gets simpler with the weird clock use
etc. removed before we add cond_resched().

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210115130253.621c948b1fad.I3ee9f4bc4e74a0c9125d42fb7c35cd80df4698a1@changeid
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

iwlwifi: pcie: limit memory read spin time

When we read device memory, we lock a spinlock, write the address we
want to read from the device and then spin in a loop reading the data
in 32-bit quanti

iwlwifi: pcie: limit memory read spin time

When we read device memory, we lock a spinlock, write the address we
want to read from the device and then spin in a loop reading the data
in 32-bit quantities from another register.

As the description makes clear, this is rather inefficient, incurring
a PCIe bus transaction for every read. In a typical device today, we
want to read 786k SMEM if it crashes, leading to 192k register reads.
Occasionally, we've seen the whole loop take over 20 seconds and then
triggering the soft lockup detector.

Clearly, it is unreasonable to spin here for such extended periods of
time.

To fix this, break the loop down into an outer and an inner loop, and
break out of the inner loop if more than half a second elapsed. To
avoid too much overhead, check for that only every 128 reads, though
there's no particular reason for that number. Then, unlock and relock
to obtain NIC access again, reprogram the start address and continue.

This will keep (interrupt) latencies on the CPU down to a reasonable
time.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201022165103.45878a7e49aa.I3b9b9c5a10002915072312ce75b68ed5b3dc6e14@changeid

show more ...

iwlwifi: read and parse PNVM file

The driver looks for a PNVM file that contains FW configuration data
for each different HW combination. The FW requests the data for a
certain SKU_ID and the drive

iwlwifi: read and parse PNVM file

The driver looks for a PNVM file that contains FW configuration data
for each different HW combination. The FW requests the data for a
certain SKU_ID and the driver tries to find it in the PNVM file.

Read the file, parse its contents and send it to the trans.

Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201008181047.826bc607e57a.I1d93dd6e6651586878db57fac3e7c3f09d742c42@changeid

show more ...