drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS

Currently we just ignore the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS flag, which is
fine since everything is already contiguous with the ttm range manager.
How

drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS

Currently we just ignore the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS flag, which is
fine since everything is already contiguous with the ttm range manager.
However in the next patch we want to switch over to the ttm buddy
manager, where allocations are by default not contiguous.

v2(Thomas):
- Forward ALLOC_CONTIG for all regions

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-4-matthew.auld@intel.com

show more ...

drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time

Instead of relying on a static placement, calculate at get_pages() time.
This should work for LMEM regions and system for now. For stol

drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time

Instead of relying on a static placement, calculate at get_pages() time.
This should work for LMEM regions and system for now. For stolen we need
to take preallocated range into account. That will if needed be added
later.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-3-matthew.auld@intel.com

show more ...

drm/i915/ttm: Fix memory leaks

Fix two memory leaks introduced with the ttm backend.

Fixes: 213d50927763 ("drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <t

drm/i915/ttm: Fix memory leaks

Fix two memory leaks introduced with the ttm backend.

Fixes: 213d50927763 ("drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210615122408.32347-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com

show more ...

drm/i915: Use ttm mmap handling for ttm bo's.

Use the ttm handlers for servicing page faults, and vm_access.

We do our own validation of read-only access, otherwise use the
ttm handlers as much as

drm/i915: Use ttm mmap handling for ttm bo's.

Use the ttm handlers for servicing page faults, and vm_access.

We do our own validation of read-only access, otherwise use the
ttm handlers as much as possible.

Because the ttm handlers expect the vma_node at vma->base, we slightly
need to massage the mmap handlers to look at vma_node->driver_private
to fetch the bo, if it's NULL, we assume i915's normal mmap_offset uapi
is used.

This is the easiest way to achieve compatibility without changing ttm's
semantics.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-5-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com

show more ...

drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality

drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend

Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.

Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.

We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.

Remove the old lmem backend.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com

show more ...