History log of /openbmc/linux/crypto/proc.c (Results 51 – 52 of 52)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v2.6.18-rc3, v2.6.18-rc2, v2.6.18-rc1, v2.6.17, v2.6.17-rc6, v2.6.17-rc5, v2.6.17-rc4, v2.6.17-rc3, v2.6.17-rc2, v2.6.17-rc1, v2.6.16, v2.6.16-rc6, v2.6.16-rc5, v2.6.16-rc4, v2.6.16-rc3, v2.6.16-rc2, v2.6.16-rc1, v2.6.15, v2.6.15-rc7, v2.6.15-rc6, v2.6.15-rc5, v2.6.15-rc4, v2.6.15-rc3, v2.6.15-rc2, v2.6.15-rc1
# 5cb1454b 04-Nov-2005 Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

[CRYPTO] Allow multiple implementations of the same algorithm

This is the first step on the road towards asynchronous support in
the Crypto API. It adds support for having multiple cryp

[CRYPTO] Allow multiple implementations of the same algorithm

This is the first step on the road towards asynchronous support in
the Crypto API. It adds support for having multiple crypto_alg objects
for the same algorithm registered in the system.

For example, each device driver would register a crypto_alg object
for each algorithm that it supports. While at the same time the
user may load software implementations of those same algorithms.

Users of the Crypto API may then select a specific implementation
by name, or choose any implementation for a given algorithm with
the highest priority.

The priority field is a 32-bit signed integer. In future it will be
possible to modify it from user-space.

This also provides a solution to the problem of selecting amongst
various AES implementations, that is, aes vs. aes-i586 vs. aes-padlock.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.14, v2.6.14-rc5, v2.6.14-rc4, v2.6.14-rc3, v2.6.14-rc2, v2.6.14-rc1, v2.6.13, v2.6.13-rc7, v2.6.13-rc6, v2.6.13-rc5, v2.6.13-rc4, v2.6.13-rc3, v2.6.13-rc2, v2.6.13-rc1, v2.6.12, v2.6.12-rc6, v2.6.12-rc5, v2.6.12-rc4, v2.6.12-rc3, v2.6.12-rc2
# 1da177e4 16-Apr-2005 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org>

Linux-2.6.12-rc2

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we

Linux-2.6.12-rc2

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!

show more ...


123