History log of /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/kernel/check.c (Results 26 – 37 of 37)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v4.1, v4.1-rc8, v4.1-rc7, v4.1-rc6, v4.1-rc5, v4.1-rc4, v4.1-rc3, v4.1-rc2, v4.1-rc1, v4.0, v4.0-rc7, v4.0-rc6, v4.0-rc5, v4.0-rc4, v4.0-rc3, v4.0-rc2, v4.0-rc1, v3.19, v3.19-rc7, v3.19-rc6, v3.19-rc5, v3.19-rc4, v3.19-rc3, v3.19-rc2, v3.19-rc1, v3.18, v3.18-rc7, v3.18-rc6, v3.18-rc5, v3.18-rc4, v3.18-rc3, v3.18-rc2, v3.18-rc1, v3.17, v3.17-rc7, v3.17-rc6, v3.17-rc5, v3.17-rc4, v3.17-rc3, v3.17-rc2, v3.17-rc1, v3.16, v3.16-rc7, v3.16-rc6, v3.16-rc5, v3.16-rc4, v3.16-rc3, v3.16-rc2, v3.16-rc1, v3.15, v3.15-rc8, v3.15-rc7, v3.15-rc6, v3.15-rc5, v3.15-rc4, v3.15-rc3, v3.15-rc2, v3.15-rc1, v3.14, v3.14-rc8, v3.14-rc7, v3.14-rc6, v3.14-rc5, v3.14-rc4, v3.14-rc3, v3.14-rc2, v3.14-rc1
# 9a28f9dc 21-Jan-2014 Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>

x86/mm: memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE

Update X86 code to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES while
calling memblock APIs, because memblock API will be changed to use
NUMA

x86/mm: memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE

Update X86 code to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES while
calling memblock APIs, because memblock API will be changed to use
NUMA_NO_NODE and will produce warning during boot otherwise.

See:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/9/898

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.13, v3.13-rc8, v3.13-rc7, v3.13-rc6, v3.13-rc5, v3.13-rc4, v3.13-rc3, v3.13-rc2, v3.13-rc1, v3.12, v3.12-rc7, v3.12-rc6, v3.12-rc5, v3.12-rc4, v3.12-rc3, v3.12-rc2, v3.12-rc1, v3.11, v3.11-rc7, v3.11-rc6, v3.11-rc5, v3.11-rc4, v3.11-rc3, v3.11-rc2, v3.11-rc1, v3.10, v3.10-rc7, v3.10-rc6, v3.10-rc5, v3.10-rc4, v3.10-rc3, v3.10-rc2, v3.10-rc1, v3.9, v3.9-rc8, v3.9-rc7, v3.9-rc6, v3.9-rc5, v3.9-rc4, v3.9-rc3, v3.9-rc2, v3.9-rc1, v3.8, v3.8-rc7, v3.8-rc6, v3.8-rc5, v3.8-rc4, v3.8-rc3, v3.8-rc2, v3.8-rc1, v3.7, v3.7-rc8, v3.7-rc7, v3.7-rc6, v3.7-rc5, v3.7-rc4, v3.7-rc3, v3.7-rc2, v3.7-rc1, v3.6, v3.6-rc7, v3.6-rc6, v3.6-rc5, v3.6-rc4, v3.6-rc3, v3.6-rc2, v3.6-rc1, v3.5, v3.5-rc7, v3.5-rc6, v3.5-rc5, v3.5-rc4, v3.5-rc3, v3.5-rc2, v3.5-rc1, v3.4, v3.4-rc7, v3.4-rc6
# 5abe68e4 06-May-2012 Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com>

x86: kernel/check.c simple_strtoul cleanup

Change set_corruption_check() and set_corruption_check_period()
in kernel/check.c to call kstrtoul() instead of calling
obsoleted simple_st

x86: kernel/check.c simple_strtoul cleanup

Change set_corruption_check() and set_corruption_check_period()
in kernel/check.c to call kstrtoul() instead of calling
obsoleted simple_strtoul().

Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1336326908.2897.12.camel@lorien2
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.4-rc5, v3.4-rc4, v3.4-rc3, v3.4-rc2, v3.4-rc1, v3.3, v3.3-rc7, v3.3-rc6, v3.3-rc5, v3.3-rc4, v3.3-rc3, v3.3-rc2, v3.3-rc1, v3.2, v3.2-rc7, v3.2-rc6, v3.2-rc5, v3.2-rc4, v3.2-rc3, v3.2-rc2, v3.2-rc1, v3.1, v3.1-rc10, v3.1-rc9, v3.1-rc8, v3.1-rc7, v3.1-rc6, v3.1-rc5, v3.1-rc4, v3.1-rc3, v3.1-rc2, v3.1-rc1, v3.0
# 24aa0788 12-Jul-2011 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones

Other than sanity check and debug message, the x86 specific version of
memblock reserve/free functions are simp

memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones

Other than sanity check and debug message, the x86 specific version of
memblock reserve/free functions are simple wrappers around the generic
versions - memblock_reserve/free().

This patch adds debug messages with caller identification to the
generic versions and replaces x86 specific ones and kills them.
arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h and arch/x86/mm/memblock.c are empty
after this change and removed.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

show more ...


# 8d89ac80 12-Jul-2011 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range()

setup_bios_corruption_check() and memtest do_one_pass() open code
memblock free area iteration using membloc

x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range()

setup_bios_corruption_check() and memtest do_one_pass() open code
memblock free area iteration using memblock_x86_find_in_range_size().
Convert them to use for_each_free_mem_range() instead.

This leaves memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() and
memblock_x86_check_reserved_size() unused. Kill them.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

show more ...


# 1f5026a7 12-Jul-2011 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

memblock: Kill MEMBLOCK_ERROR

25818f0f28 (memblock: Make MEMBLOCK_ERROR be 0) thankfully made
MEMBLOCK_ERROR 0 and there already are codes which expect error return
to be 0. There's

memblock: Kill MEMBLOCK_ERROR

25818f0f28 (memblock: Make MEMBLOCK_ERROR be 0) thankfully made
MEMBLOCK_ERROR 0 and there already are codes which expect error return
to be 0. There's no point in keeping MEMBLOCK_ERROR around. End its
misery.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v3.0-rc7, v3.0-rc6, v3.0-rc5, v3.0-rc4, v3.0-rc3, v3.0-rc2, v3.0-rc1, v2.6.39, v2.6.39-rc7, v2.6.39-rc6, v2.6.39-rc5, v2.6.39-rc4, v2.6.39-rc3, v2.6.39-rc2, v2.6.39-rc1, v2.6.38, v2.6.38-rc8, v2.6.38-rc7
# a7bd1daf 25-Feb-2011 Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>

x86: Don't check for BIOS corruption in first 64K when there's no need to

Due to commit 781c5a67f152c17c3e4a9ed9647f8c0be6ea5ae9 it is
likely that the number of areas to scan for BIOS co

x86: Don't check for BIOS corruption in first 64K when there's no need to

Due to commit 781c5a67f152c17c3e4a9ed9647f8c0be6ea5ae9 it is
likely that the number of areas to scan for BIOS corruption is 0
-- especially when the first 64K is already reserved
(X86_RESERVE_LOW is 64K by default).

If that's the case then don't set up the scan.

Signed-off-by: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110225202838.2229.71011.sendpatchset@nchumbalkar.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.38-rc6, v2.6.38-rc5, v2.6.38-rc4, v2.6.38-rc3, v2.6.38-rc2, v2.6.38-rc1, v2.6.37, v2.6.37-rc8, v2.6.37-rc7, v2.6.37-rc6, v2.6.37-rc5, v2.6.37-rc4, v2.6.37-rc3, v2.6.37-rc2, v2.6.37-rc1, v2.6.36, v2.6.36-rc8, v2.6.36-rc7, v2.6.36-rc6, v2.6.36-rc5, v2.6.36-rc4, v2.6.36-rc3
# 72d7c3b3 25-Aug-2010 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

x86: Use memblock to replace early_res

1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
3. replace free_early with membl

x86: Use memblock to replace early_res

1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range.
4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too.
5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will
replace them all
6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care
7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill()
so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch()
-- corruption_check and mptable_update

-v2: Move reserve_brk() early
Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range()
that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and
memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for
memblock.memory.region array.
and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area()
So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area().
-v3: Move find_smp_config early
To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable
in right place.
-v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in
memblock.reserved already..
use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later.
-v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit
active_region for 32bit does include high pages
need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped()
-v6: Use current_limit instead
-v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L
-v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries
-v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline

Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Suggested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.36-rc2, v2.6.36-rc1, v2.6.35, v2.6.35-rc6, v2.6.35-rc5, v2.6.35-rc4, v2.6.35-rc3, v2.6.35-rc2, v2.6.35-rc1, v2.6.34, v2.6.34-rc7, v2.6.34-rc6, v2.6.34-rc5, v2.6.34-rc4, v2.6.34-rc3, v2.6.34-rc2, v2.6.34-rc1, v2.6.33, v2.6.33-rc8, v2.6.33-rc7, v2.6.33-rc6, v2.6.33-rc5, v2.6.33-rc4, v2.6.33-rc3, v2.6.33-rc2, v2.6.33-rc1, v2.6.32, v2.6.32-rc8, v2.6.32-rc7, v2.6.32-rc6, v2.6.32-rc5, v2.6.32-rc4, v2.6.32-rc3, v2.6.32-rc1, v2.6.32-rc2, v2.6.31, v2.6.31-rc9, v2.6.31-rc8, v2.6.31-rc7, v2.6.31-rc6, v2.6.31-rc5, v2.6.31-rc4, v2.6.31-rc3, v2.6.31-rc2, v2.6.31-rc1, v2.6.30, v2.6.30-rc8, v2.6.30-rc7, v2.6.30-rc6, v2.6.30-rc5, v2.6.30-rc4, v2.6.30-rc3, v2.6.30-rc2, v2.6.30-rc1, v2.6.29
# 6d7942dc 14-Mar-2009 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

x86: fix 64k corruption-check

Impact: fix boot crash

Need to exit early if the addr is far above 64k.

The crash got exposed by:

78a8b35: x86: make e820_update_ra

x86: fix 64k corruption-check

Impact: fix boot crash

Need to exit early if the addr is far above 64k.

The crash got exposed by:

78a8b35: x86: make e820_update_range() handle small range update

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <49BC2279.2030101@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.29-rc8
# 5c0e6f03 12-Mar-2009 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>

x86: fix code paths used by update_mptable

Impact: fix crashes under Xen due to unrobust e820 code

find_e820_area_size() must return a properly distinguishable and
out-of-bounds

x86: fix code paths used by update_mptable

Impact: fix crashes under Xen due to unrobust e820 code

find_e820_area_size() must return a properly distinguishable and
out-of-bounds value when it fails, and -1UL does not meet that
criteria on i386/PAE. Additionally, callers of the function must
check against that value.

early_reserve_e820() should be prepared for the region found to be
outside of the addressable range on 32-bits.

e820_update_range_map() should not blindly update e820, but should do
all it work on the map it got a pointer passed for (which in 50% of the
cases is &e820_saved). It must also not call e820_add_region(), as that
again acts on e820 unconditionally.

The issues were found when trying to make this option work in our Xen
kernel (i.e. where some of the silent assumptions made in the code
would not hold).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
LKML-Reference: <49B9171B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2.6.29-rc7, v2.6.29-rc6, v2.6.29-rc5, v2.6.29-rc4, v2.6.29-rc3, v2.6.29-rc2, v2.6.29-rc1, v2.6.28, v2.6.28-rc9, v2.6.28-rc8, v2.6.28-rc7, v2.6.28-rc6, v2.6.28-rc5, v2.6.28-rc4, v2.6.28-rc3, v2.6.28-rc2, v2.6.28-rc1, v2.6.27, v2.6.27-rc9
# b43d196c 05-Oct-2008 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>

x86: corruption-check: some post-move cleanups

Impact: cleanup

now that the code is moved and converted to a work queue,
there's some minor cleanups that can be done.

S

x86: corruption-check: some post-move cleanups

Impact: cleanup

now that the code is moved and converted to a work queue,
there's some minor cleanups that can be done.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...


# 304e629b 05-Oct-2008 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>

x86: corruption check: run the corruption checks from a work queue

Impact: change the implementation of the debug feature

the periodic corruption checks are better off run from a wo

x86: corruption check: run the corruption checks from a work queue

Impact: change the implementation of the debug feature

the periodic corruption checks are better off run from a work queue; there's
nothing time critical about them and this way the amount of
interrupt-context work is reduced.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...


# 6784f7d0 05-Oct-2008 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>

x86: corruption check: move the corruption checks into their own file

Impact: cleanup

The corruption check code is rather sizable and it's likely to grow over
time when we add c

x86: corruption check: move the corruption checks into their own file

Impact: cleanup

The corruption check code is rather sizable and it's likely to grow over
time when we add checks for more types of corruptions (there's a few
candidates in kerneloops.org that I want to add checks for)... so lets move
it to its own file

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...


12