arm64: Replace strncmp with str_has_prefix

In commit b6b2735514bc
("tracing: Use str_has_prefix() instead of using fixed sizes")
the newly introduced str_has_prefix() was used
to

arm64: Replace strncmp with str_has_prefix

In commit b6b2735514bc
("tracing: Use str_has_prefix() instead of using fixed sizes")
the newly introduced str_has_prefix() was used
to replace error-prone strncmp(str, const, len).
Here fix codes with the same pattern.

Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

show more ...

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500

Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it u

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500

Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation #

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

arm64/module: switch to ADRP/ADD sequences for PLT entries

Now that we have switched to the small code model entirely, and
reduced the extended KASLR range to 4 GB, we can be sure that t

arm64/module: switch to ADRP/ADD sequences for PLT entries

Now that we have switched to the small code model entirely, and
reduced the extended KASLR range to 4 GB, we can be sure that the
targets of relative branches that are out of range are in range
for a ADRP/ADD pair, which is one instruction shorter than our
current MOVN/MOVK/MOVK sequence, and is more idiomatic and so it
is more likely to be implemented efficiently by micro-architectures.

So switch over the ordinary PLT code and the special handling of
the Cortex-A53 ADRP errata, as well as the ftrace trampline
handling.

Reviewed-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
[will: Added a couple of comments in the plt equality check]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64/module: use plt section indices for relocations

Instead of saving a pointer to the .plt and .init.plt sections to apply
plt-based relocations, save and use their section indices in

arm64/module: use plt section indices for relocations

Instead of saving a pointer to the .plt and .init.plt sections to apply
plt-based relocations, save and use their section indices instead.

The mod->arch.{core,init}.plt pointers were problematic for livepatch
because they pointed within temporary section headers (provided by the
module loader via info->sechdrs) that would be freed after module load.
Since livepatch modules may need to apply relocations post-module-load
(for example, to patch a module that is loaded later), using section
indices to offset into the section headers (instead of accessing them
through a saved pointer) allows livepatch modules on arm64 to pass in
their own copy of the section headers to apply_relocate_add() to apply
delayed relocations.

Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64/kernel: rename module_emit_adrp_veneer->module_emit_veneer_for_adrp

Commit a257e02579e ("arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around
Cortex-A53 erratum #843419") introduced a funct

arm64/kernel: rename module_emit_adrp_veneer->module_emit_veneer_for_adrp

Commit a257e02579e ("arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around
Cortex-A53 erratum #843419") introduced a function whose name ends with
"_veneer".

This clashes with commit bd8b22d2888e ("Kbuild: kallsyms: ignore veneers
emitted by the ARM linker"), which removes symbols ending in "_veneer"
from kallsyms.

The problem was manifested as 'perf test -vvvvv vmlinux' failed,
correctly claiming the symbol 'module_emit_adrp_veneer' was present in
vmlinux, but not in kallsyms.

...
ERR : 0xffff00000809aa58: module_emit_adrp_veneer not on kallsyms
...
test child finished with -1
---- end ----
vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms: FAILED!

Fix the problem by renaming module_emit_adrp_veneer to
module_emit_veneer_for_adrp. Now the test passes.

Fixes: a257e02579e ("arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419")
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64/kernel: enable A53 erratum #8434319 handling at runtime

Omit patching of ADRP instruction at module load time if the current
CPUs are not susceptible to the erratum.

Signe

arm64/kernel: enable A53 erratum #8434319 handling at runtime

Omit patching of ADRP instruction at module load time if the current
CPUs are not susceptible to the erratum.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
[will: Drop duplicate initialisation of .def_scope field]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419

Working around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419 involves special handling of
ADRP instructions that end up in the last tw

arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419

Working around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419 involves special handling of
ADRP instructions that end up in the last two instruction slots of a
4k page, or whose output register gets overwritten without having been
read. (Note that the latter instruction sequence is never emitted by
a properly functioning compiler, which is why it is disregarded by the
handling of the same erratum in the bfd.ld linker which we rely on for
the core kernel)

Normally, this gets taken care of by the linker, which can spot such
sequences at final link time, and insert a veneer if the ADRP ends up
at a vulnerable offset. However, linux kernel modules are partially
linked ELF objects, and so there is no 'final link time' other than the
runtime loading of the module, at which time all the static relocations
are resolved.

For this reason, we have implemented the #843419 workaround for modules
by avoiding ADRP instructions altogether, by using the large C model,
and by passing -mpc-relative-literal-loads to recent versions of GCC
that may emit adrp/ldr pairs to perform literal loads. However, this
workaround forces us to keep literal data mixed with the instructions
in the executable .text segment, and literal data may inadvertently
turn into an exploitable speculative gadget depending on the relative
offsets of arbitrary symbols.

So let's reimplement this workaround in a way that allows us to switch
back to the small C model, and to drop the -mpc-relative-literal-loads
GCC switch, by patching affected ADRP instructions at runtime:
- ADRP instructions that do not appear at 4k relative offset 0xff8 or
0xffc are ignored
- ADRP instructions that are within 1 MB of their target symbol are
converted into ADR instructions
- remaining ADRP instructions are redirected via a veneer that performs
the load using an unaffected movn/movk sequence.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
[will: tidied up ADRP -> ADR instruction patching.]
[will: use ULL suffix for 64-bit immediate]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64: module: don't BUG when exceeding preallocated PLT count

When PLTs are emitted at relocation time, we really should not exceed
the number that we counted when parsing the relocatio

arm64: module: don't BUG when exceeding preallocated PLT count

When PLTs are emitted at relocation time, we really should not exceed
the number that we counted when parsing the relocation tables, and so
currently, we BUG() on this condition. However, even though this is a
clear bug in this particular piece of code, we can easily recover by
failing to load the module.

So instead, return 0 from module_emit_plt_entry() if this condition
occurs, which is not a valid kernel address, and can hence serve as
a flag value that makes the relocation routine bail out.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64: ftrace: emit ftrace-mod.o contents through code

When building the arm64 kernel with both CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS and
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE enabled, the ftrace-mod.o object file i

arm64: ftrace: emit ftrace-mod.o contents through code

When building the arm64 kernel with both CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS and
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE enabled, the ftrace-mod.o object file is built
with the kernel and contains a trampoline that is linked into each
module, so that modules can be loaded far away from the kernel and
still reach the ftrace entry point in the core kernel with an ordinary
relative branch, as is emitted by the compiler instrumentation code
dynamic ftrace relies on.

In order to be able to build out of tree modules, this object file
needs to be included into the linux-headers or linux-devel packages,
which is undesirable, as it makes arm64 a special case (although a
precedent does exist for 32-bit PPC).

Given that the trampoline essentially consists of a PLT entry, let's
not bother with a source or object file for it, and simply patch it
in whenever the trampoline is being populated, using the existing
PLT support routines.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64: module-plts: factor out PLT generation code for ftrace

To allow the ftrace trampoline code to reuse the PLT entry routines,
factor it out and move it into asm/module.h.

C

arm64: module-plts: factor out PLT generation code for ftrace

To allow the ftrace trampoline code to reuse the PLT entry routines,
factor it out and move it into asm/module.h.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64: module: split core and init PLT sections

The arm64 module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is

arm64: module: split core and init PLT sections

The arm64 module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.

However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This leads to relocation failures if the distance between those
regions exceeds 128 MB. (In fact, this corner case is highly unlikely to
occur on arm64, but the issue has been observed on ARM, whose module
region is much smaller).

So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section as the relocated branch instruction.

Since there may now be two PLT entries associated with each entry in
the symbol table, we can no longer hijack the symbol::st_size fields
to record the addresses of PLT entries as we emit them for zero-addend
relocations. So instead, perform an explicit comparison to check for
duplicate entries.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

show more ...

arm64: add support for module PLTs

This adds support for emitting PLTs at module load time for relative
branches that are out of range. This is a prerequisite for KASLR, which
may pl

arm64: add support for module PLTs

This adds support for emitting PLTs at module load time for relative
branches that are out of range. This is a prerequisite for KASLR, which
may place the kernel and the modules anywhere in the vmalloc area,
making it more likely that branch target offsets exceed the maximum
range of +/- 128 MB.

In this version, I removed the distinction between relocations against
.init executable sections and ordinary executable sections. The reason
is that it is hardly worth the trouble, given that .init.text usually
does not contain that many far branches, and this version now only
reserves PLT entry space for jump and call relocations against undefined
symbols (since symbols defined in the same module can be assumed to be
within +/- 128 MB)

For example, the mac80211.ko module (which is fairly sizable at ~400 KB)
built with -mcmodel=large gives the following relocation counts:

relocs branches unique !local
.text 3925 3347 518 219
.init.text 11 8 7 1
.exit.text 4 4 4 1
.text.unlikely 81 67 36 17

('unique' means branches to unique type/symbol/addend combos, of which
!local is the subset referring to undefined symbols)

IOW, we are only emitting a single PLT entry for the .init sections, and
we are better off just adding it to the core PLT section instead.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

show more ...